
GeForce FX 5200SE

GeForce4 Ti 4800
GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone
GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4800: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5200SE
2012Why buy it
- ✅+100% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 706.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.1 vs 0.0 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 216mm, a 48mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
GeForce4 Ti 4800
2010Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6 vs 12).
- ❌2010 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌303% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.0 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5200SE vs GeForce4 Ti 4800 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5200SE
The GeForce FX 5200SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 20 2012. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 736 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12 points. Launch price was $89.99.

GeForce4 Ti 4800
The GeForce4 Ti 4800 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5200SE scores 12 versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 6 — the GeForce FX 5200SE leads by 100%. The GeForce FX 5200SE is built on Rankine while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 288 (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 480 (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Raw compute: 0.8479 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 1.345 TFLOPS (GeForce4 Ti 4800).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200SE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12+100% | 6 |
| Architecture | Rankine | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 288 | 480+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.8479 TFLOPS | 1.345 TFLOPS+59% |
| ROPs | 24 | 48+100% |
| TMUs | 48 | 60+25% |
| L1 Cache | 384 KB | 960 KB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 768 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200SE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5200SE and 64-bit on the GeForce4 Ti 4800. L2 Cache: 384 KB (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 768 KB (GeForce4 Ti 4800) — the GeForce4 Ti 4800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200SE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 384 KB | 768 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 8.1 (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200SE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a+11% | 8.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | None |
| OpenGL | 1.5+15% | 1.3 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs No (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Decoder: None vs No.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200SE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | No |
| Decoder | None | No |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5200SE draws 150W versus the GeForce4 Ti 4800's 250W — a 50% difference. The GeForce FX 5200SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 350W (GeForce4 Ti 4800). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 216mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200SE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | 216mm |
| Height | 100mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | 65°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.1 | 0.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce FX 5200SE came in at $99, while the GeForce4 Ti 4800 launched at $399. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5200SE was 75.2% cheaper ($300 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GeForce FX 5200SE) vs 0.0 (GeForce4 Ti 4800) — the GeForce FX 5200SE offers 100+% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5200SE (2012 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5200SE | GeForce4 Ti 4800 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-75% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | 0.0 |
| Codename | GF114 | GF100 |
| Release | February 20 2012 | March 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #706 | #488 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













