GeForce FX 5600XT vs GeForce GTX 1650

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5600XT

2011Core: 810 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz
GTX family
·······

GeForce FX 5600XT vs GeForce GTX 1650 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5600XT vs GeForce GTX 1650 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5600XT vs GeForce GTX 1650: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5600XT

2011

Why buy it

  • Costs $20 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1650 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.1 vs 52.8 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 100% higher power demand at 150W vs 75W.

GeForce GTX 1650

2019

Why buy it

  • 6866.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 75597.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 52.8 vs 0.1 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
  • 700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 512 MB).
  • GeForce FX 5600XT is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce GTX 1650 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 75W instead of 150W, a 75W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6866.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 87333.3% in PassMark G3D (7,869 vs 9), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 1650 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, a 12nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 1650 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 more expensive on MSRP at $149 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 75597.3% (52.8 vs 0.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce FX 5600XT vs GeForce GTX 1650 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5600XT

The GeForce FX 5600XT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 810 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9 points. Launch price was $199.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5600XT scores 9 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 87333.3%. The GeForce FX 5600XT is built on Rankine while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 40 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 336 (GeForce FX 5600XT) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5600XT) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650).

FeatureGeForce FX 5600XTGeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
9
7,869+87333%
Architecture
Rankine
Turing
Process Node
40 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
336
896+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.089 TFLOPS
2.984 TFLOPS+174%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
56
56
L1 Cache
448 KB
896 KB+100%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce FX 5600XTGeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5600XT has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 carries 4 GB. GeForce GTX 1650 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5600XT and 128-bit on the GeForce GTX 1650. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce FX 5600XT) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5600XTGeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
4 GB+700%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
128 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5600XT) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce FX 5600XTGeForce GTX 1650
DirectX
9.0a
12+33%
OpenGL
1.5
4.6+207%
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5600XT draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5600XT) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Legacy vs None. Typical load temperature: 55°C vs 70°C.

FeatureGeForce FX 5600XTGeForce GTX 1650
TDP
150W
75W-50%
Recommended PSU
350W
300W-14%
Power Connector
Legacy
None
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
55°C-21%
70°C
Perf/Watt
0.1
104.9+104800%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5600XT came in at $129, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5600XT was 13.4% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.1 (GeForce FX 5600XT) vs 52.8 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 52700% better value. The newer card here is GeForce GTX 1650 (2019 vs 2011).

FeatureGeForce FX 5600XTGeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$129-13%
$149
Performance per Dollar
0.1
52.8+52700%
Codename
GF114
TU117
Release
May 17 2011
April 23 2019
Ranking
#605
#323

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.