G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 6150 vs GeForce RTX 4060 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 6150 vs GeForce RTX 4060: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 6150

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 115W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 65.4 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

GeForce RTX 4060

2023

Why buy it

✅14784.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 65.4 vs 0 G3D/$ ($299 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅1500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌76.9% higher power demand at 115W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14784.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 102784.2% in PassMark G3D (19,548 vs 19), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer feature stack, with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) and DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023), while GeForce Go 6150 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 5nm process instead of 28nm, and 24 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce RTX 4060 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce Go 6150 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 6150

The GeForce Go 6150 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 6 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 1058 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19 points. Launch price was $109.

GeForce RTX 4060

The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce Go 6150 scores 19 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 102784.2%. The GeForce Go 6150 is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce Go 6150) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 0.8125 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 6150) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060).

Feature	GeForce Go 6150	GeForce RTX 4060
G3D Mark Score	19	19,548+102784%
Architecture	Kepler	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	28 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	384	3072+700%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.8125 TFLOPS	15.11 TFLOPS+1760%
ROPs	16	48+200%
TMUs	32	96+200%
L1 Cache	0.03 MB	3 MB+9900%
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	24 MB+9500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The GeForce Go 6150 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The GeForce RTX 4060 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce Go 6150 is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce Go 6150	GeForce RTX 4060
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 6150 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 carries 8 GB. GeForce RTX 4060 gives you 1500% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 6150 and 128-bit on the GeForce RTX 4060. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce Go 6150) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce Go 6150	GeForce RTX 4060
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	8 GB+1500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	272 GB/s
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.25 MB	24 MB+9500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce Go 6150) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce Go 6150	GeForce RTX 4060
DirectX	10.0	12 Ultimate+20%
Vulkan	None	1.3
OpenGL	2.1	4.6+119%
Max Displays	1	4+300%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 6150) vs NVENC 8th gen (GeForce RTX 4060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce Go 6150) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).

Feature	GeForce Go 6150	GeForce RTX 4060
Encoder	No	NVENC 8th gen
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP2	NVDEC 5th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 6150 draws 65W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 55.6% difference. The GeForce Go 6150 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 6150) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 73°C.

Feature	GeForce Go 6150	GeForce RTX 4060
TDP	65W-43%	115W
Recommended PSU	350W-36%	550W
Power Connector	Legacy	8-pin
Length	0mm	240mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	73°C-3%
Perf/Watt	0.3	170.0+56567%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce RTX 4060 (2023 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce Go 6150	GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP	—	$299
Codename	GK107	AD107
Release	September 6 2012	May 18 2023
Ranking	#719	#84

Search GeForce Go 6150 on Amazon

Search GeForce RTX 4060 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.