
GeForce Go 7950 GTX

Radeon HD 8280E
GeForce Go 7950 GTX vs Radeon HD 8280E Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce Go 7950 GTX vs Radeon HD 8280E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce Go 7950 GTX vs Radeon HD 8280E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce Go 7950 GTX
2014Why buy it
- ✅12.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.
Radeon HD 8280E
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce Go 7950 GTX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce Go 7950 GTX vs Radeon HD 8280E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 7950 GTX
The GeForce Go 7950 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 264 points. Launch price was $149.

Radeon HD 8280E
The Radeon HD 8280E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 256 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce Go 7950 GTX scores 264 and the Radeon HD 8280E reaches 256 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7950 GTX is built on Maxwell while the Radeon HD 8280E uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 640 (GeForce Go 7950 GTX) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8280E). Raw compute: 1.389 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7950 GTX) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8280E). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 775 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7950 GTX | Radeon HD 8280E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 264+3% | 256 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.389 TFLOPS+40% | 0.992 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1085 MHz+40% | 775 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 40 | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+100% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce Go 7950 GTX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 8280E leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7950 GTX | Radeon HD 8280E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7950 GTX and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8280E. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce Go 7950 GTX) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 8280E) — the GeForce Go 7950 GTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7950 GTX | Radeon HD 8280E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7950 GTX) vs 11_1 (Radeon HD 8280E). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7950 GTX | Radeon HD 8280E |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 11_1+22% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 7950 GTX) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon HD 8280E). Decoder: PureVideo vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7950 GTX | Radeon HD 8280E |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce Go 7950 GTX draws 75W versus the Radeon HD 8280E's 50W — a 40% difference. The Radeon HD 8280E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7950 GTX) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8280E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce Go 7950 GTX | Radeon HD 8280E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 50W-33% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.5 | 5.1+46% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce Go 7950 GTX (2014 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce Go 7950 GTX | Radeon HD 8280E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Codename | GM107 | Venus |
| Release | February 18 2014 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #501 | #745 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














