GeForce GT 120M
VS
GeForce 9400

GeForce GT 120M vs GeForce 9400

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 120M

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce 9400

2015Core: 1072 MHzBoost: 1176 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 120M is positioned at rank 124 and the GeForce 9400 is on rank 616, so the GeForce GT 120M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 120M

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
720%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
692%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
684%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
683%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
681%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
678%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
669%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
667%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
660%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
659%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
651%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
649%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
638%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
637%
#84
Radeon Ryzen 5 6600H
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
98%
#85
Radeon Ryzen 7 6800U
MSRP: $450|Avg: $450
93%
#109
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
794%
#124
GeForce GT 120M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#125
Radeon HD 8650G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
100%
#126
GeForce GT 630
MSRP: $69|Avg: $20
99%
#128
Radeon HD 6770
MSRP: $129|Avg: $129
98%
#129
GeForce GT 440
MSRP: $79|Avg: $40
97%
#130
Radeon R7 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
96%
#133
Radeon HD 6750
MSRP: $109|Avg: $109
95%
#135
Radeon R5 240
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
94%
#136
Radeon R5 340
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
94%
#137
Radeon HD 8570
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
94%
#139
GeForce GT 730
MSRP: $89|Avg: $45
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9400

#605
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
4360%
#607
3953%
#608
3942%
#612
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
3585%
#613
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
3560%
#615
GeForce 9800 GTX/9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $40
100%
#616
GeForce 9400
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
100%
#617
GeForce 7350 LE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $10
99%
#619
Mobility Radeon HD 3850
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
98%
#620
Mobility Radeon HD 4870
MSRP: $299|Avg: $20
97%
#621
GeForce 9800M GT
MSRP: $160|Avg: $5
96%
#622
94%
#623
Radeon HD 8550G + 8670M Dual
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
93%
#624
GeForce 8300 GS
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
92%
#625
91%
#626
90%
#627
GeForce 9500M GS
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
89%
#628
GeForce 8800 GS
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
88%
#630
GeForce 9800 GTX+
MSRP: $229|Avg: $50
86%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 120M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 9400.

InsightGeForce GT 120MGeForce 9400
Performance
Leading raw performance (+2.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-2.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 120M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 120M and GeForce 9400

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 120M

The GeForce GT 120M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 151 points. Launch price was $79.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9400

The GeForce 9400 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 147 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 120M scores 151 and the GeForce 9400 reaches 147 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 120M is built on Pascal while the GeForce 9400 uses Maxwell, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 120M) vs 384 (GeForce 9400). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 120M) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1176 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 120MGeForce 9400
G3D Mark Score
151+3%
147
Architecture
Pascal
Maxwell
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.127 TFLOPS+25%
0.9032 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1468 MHz+25%
1176 MHz
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
144 KB
192 KB+33%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 120MGeForce 9400
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 120M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9400 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 120M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GT 120M) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9400) — the GeForce 9400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT 120MGeForce 9400
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
0.5 MB
1 MB+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.1 (FL10_0) (GeForce GT 120M) vs 10 (GeForce 9400). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 120MGeForce 9400
DirectX
11.1 (FL10_0)+11%
10
OpenGL
3.3
3.3
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VP3 (GeForce GT 120M) vs None (GeForce 9400). Decoder: VP3 vs PureVideo HD (VP2). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 120M) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9400).

FeatureGeForce GT 120MGeForce 9400
Encoder
VP3
None
Decoder
VP3
PureVideo HD (VP2)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 120M draws 30W versus the GeForce 9400's 33W — a 9.5% difference. The GeForce GT 120M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 120M) vs 350W (GeForce 9400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.

FeatureGeForce GT 120MGeForce 9400
TDP
30W-9%
33W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Legacy
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
80°C-6%
85
Perf/Watt
5.0+11%
4.5
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT 120M is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GT 120MGeForce 9400
MSRP
$59
Avg Price (30d)
$15
Codename
GP108
GM108
Release
May 17 2017
March 13 2015
Ranking
#641
#847