GeForce GT 720M
VS
GeForce GT 620M

GeForce GT 720M vs GeForce GT 620M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 720M

2013Core: 941 MHzBoost: 967 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 620M

2012Core: Up to 900 MHzBoost: 950 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 720M is positioned at rank 189 and the GeForce GT 620M is on rank 192, so the GeForce GT 720M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 720M

#179
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
370%
#181
336%
#182
335%
#186
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
304%
#187
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
302%
#189
GeForce GT 720M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#195
GeForce GT625M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
96%
#197
95%
#203
GeForce GT 730M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 620M

#182
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
377%
#184
342%
#185
341%
#189
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
310%
#190
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
308%
#192
GeForce GT 620M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#195
GeForce GT625M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
98%
#197
97%
#203
GeForce GT 730M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
93%
#206
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GT 720M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 620M.

InsightGeForce GT 720MGeForce GT 620M
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.9%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 720M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 720M and GeForce GT 620M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 720M

The GeForce GT 720M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 9 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 941 MHz to 967 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 440 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 620M

The GeForce GT 620M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 432 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 720M scores 440 and the GeForce GT 620M reaches 432 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 720M is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 620M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 720M) vs 384 (GeForce GT 620M). Raw compute: 0.7427 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 720M) vs 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 620M). Boost clocks: 967 MHz vs 950 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT 720MGeForce GT 620M
G3D Mark Score
440+2%
432
Architecture
Kepler
Kepler
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7427 TFLOPS+2%
0.7296 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
967 MHz+2%
950 MHz
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
32 KB
32 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 720MGeForce GT 620M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureGeForce GT 720MGeForce GT 620M
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
2 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT 720M) vs 12 (FL11_0) (GeForce GT 620M). Vulkan: 1.2 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

FeatureGeForce GT 720MGeForce GT 620M
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (FL11_0)
Vulkan
1.2
None
OpenGL
4.6+12%
4.1
Max Displays
2
3+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 720M) vs No (GeForce GT 620M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP5) vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 720M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 620M).

FeatureGeForce GT 720MGeForce GT 620M
Encoder
None
No
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP5)
PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 720M draws 50W versus the GeForce GT 620M's 45W — a 10.5% difference. The GeForce GT 620M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 720M) vs 350W (GeForce GT 620M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 720MGeForce GT 620M
TDP
50W
45W-10%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
75-6%
80°C
Perf/Watt
8.8
9.6+9%