GeForce GT625M
VS
GeForce RTX 2060

GeForce GT625M vs GeForce RTX 2060

NVIDIA

GeForce GT625M

2012Core: Up to 900 MHzBoost: 950 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2060

2019Core: 1365 MHzBoost: 1680 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT625M is positioned at rank #195 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT625M

#185
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
386%
#187
350%
#188
349%
#192
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
317%
#193
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
315%
#195
GeForce GT625M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
100%
#197
100%
#203
GeForce GT 730M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
96%
#206
Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
93%
#208
Radeon RX Vega M GL
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 2060 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The GeForce RTX 2060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT625M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 2060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3244.5% higher G3D Mark score and 1100% more VRAM (6 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT625M.

InsightGeForce GT625MGeForce RTX 2060
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-3244.5%)
Leading raw performance (+3244.5%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018))
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $120 (vs $45), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1154.2% better value per dollar than the GeForce GT625M.

InsightGeForce GT625MGeForce RTX 2060
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1154.2%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($45)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT625M and GeForce RTX 2060

NVIDIA

GeForce GT625M

The GeForce GT625M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 422 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 2060

The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT625M scores 422 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the GeForce RTX 2060 leads by 3244.5%. The GeForce GT625M is built on Kepler while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT625M) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT625M) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1680 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GT625MGeForce RTX 2060
G3D Mark Score
422
14,114+3245%
Architecture
Kepler
Turing
Process Node
28 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
384
1920+400%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7296 TFLOPS
6.451 TFLOPS+784%
Boost Clock
950 MHz
1680 MHz+77%
ROPs
16
48+200%
TMUs
32
120+275%
L1 Cache
0.03 MB
1.9 MB+6233%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
3 MB+1100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT625MGeForce RTX 2060
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT625M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (GeForce GT625M) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GT625MGeForce RTX 2060
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
6 GB+1100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
336 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
192-bit+50%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
3 MB+1100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GT625M) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GT625MGeForce RTX 2060
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
2
4+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No NVENC (Fermi) (GeForce GT625M) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT625M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).

FeatureGeForce GT625MGeForce RTX 2060
Encoder
No NVENC (Fermi)
NVENC (Turing)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP4
NVDEC (Turing)
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT625M draws 45W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 112.2% difference. The GeForce GT625M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT625M) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: Legacy vs 8-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 72.

FeatureGeForce GT625MGeForce RTX 2060
TDP
45W-72%
160W
Recommended PSU
350W-30%
500W
Power Connector
Legacy
8-pin
Length
229mm
Height
113mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
72-4%
Perf/Watt
9.4
88.2+838%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GT625M costs 62.5% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.4 (GeForce GT625M) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 1151.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GT625MGeForce RTX 2060
MSRP
$349
Avg Price (30d)
$45-63%
$120
Performance per Dollar
9.4
117.6+1151%
Codename
GK107
TU106
Release
March 22 2012
January 7 2019
Ranking
#828
#168