GeForce GT625M vs RADEON E4690
GeForce GT625M
Popular choices:
RADEON E4690
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT625M is positioned at rank 195 and the RADEON E4690 is on rank 713, so the GeForce GT625M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT625M
Performance Per Dollar RADEON E4690
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT625M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON E4690.
| Insight | GeForce GT625M | RADEON E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT625M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT625M holds the technical lead. Priced at $45 (vs $558), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1192% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT625M | RADEON E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1192%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($45) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($558) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT625M and RADEON E4690
GeForce GT625M
The GeForce GT625M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 422 points.
RADEON E4690
The RADEON E4690 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 405 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT625M scores 422 and the RADEON E4690 reaches 405 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT625M is built on Kepler while the RADEON E4690 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT625M) vs 2,048 (RADEON E4690). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT625M) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON E4690). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT625M | RADEON E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 422+4% | 405 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 2048+433% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7296 TFLOPS | 4.096 TFLOPS+461% |
| Boost Clock | 950 MHz | 1000 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 128+300% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 512 KB+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT625M | RADEON E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT625M) vs 512 KB (RADEON E4690) — the RADEON E4690 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT625M | RADEON E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT625M draws 45W versus the RADEON E4690's 95W — a 71.4% difference. The GeForce GT625M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT625M) vs 350W (RADEON E4690). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | GeForce GT625M | RADEON E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-53% | 95W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 9.4+119% | 4.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT625M costs 91.9% less ($513 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 9.4 (GeForce GT625M) vs 0.7 (RADEON E4690) — the GeForce GT625M offers 1242.9% better value. The RADEON E4690 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT625M | RADEON E4690 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $558 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45-92% | $558 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.4+1243% | 0.7 |
| Codename | GK107 | Amethyst |
| Release | March 22 2012 | September 29 2015 |
| Ranking | #828 | #420 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT625M and RADEON E4690
