GeForce GT625M vs RADEON E4690

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT625M vs RADEON E4690 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT625M vs RADEON E4690: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT625M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RADEON E4690 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $558 MSRP).

RADEON E4690

2015

Why buy it

✅60.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($558 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON E4690 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 60.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT625M instead at 422 vs 405, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT625M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON E4690 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON E4690 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT625M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT625M vs RADEON E4690 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT625M

The GeForce GT625M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 422 points.

RADEON E4690

The RADEON E4690 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 405 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT625M scores 422 and the RADEON E4690 reaches 405 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT625M is built on Kepler while the RADEON E4690 uses GCN 3.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT625M) vs 2,048 (RADEON E4690). Raw compute: 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GT625M) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON E4690). Boost clocks: 950 MHz vs 1000 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GT625M	RADEON E4690
G3D Mark Score	422+4%	405
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 3.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	2048+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7296 TFLOPS	4.096 TFLOPS+461%
Boost Clock	950 MHz	1000 MHz+5%
ROPs	16	32+100%
TMUs	32	128+300%
L1 Cache	32 KB	512 KB+1500%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT625M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON E4690 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT625M	RADEON E4690
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT625M and 64-bit on the RADEON E4690. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT625M) vs 512 KB (RADEON E4690) — the RADEON E4690 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT625M	RADEON E4690
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT625M draws 45W versus the RADEON E4690's 95W — a 71.4% difference. The GeForce GT625M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT625M) vs 350W (RADEON E4690). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce GT625M	RADEON E4690
TDP	45W-53%	95W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	9.4+119%	4.3

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RADEON E4690 (2015 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GT625M	RADEON E4690
MSRP	—	$558
Codename	GK107	Amethyst
Release	March 22 2012	September 29 2015
Ranking	#828	#420

Search GeForce GT625M on Amazon

Search RADEON E4690 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.