GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1771 MHz
GTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

2024Core: 1620 MHzBoost: 2130 MHz
RTX family
·······

GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)

2016

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than RTX 2000E Ada Generation across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2016 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $999 MSRP).

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

2024

Why buy it

  • 9.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 9.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) instead at 15,614 vs 15,252, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 16 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 16nm, and 22 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX 2000E Ada Generation makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)

The GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 15 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1771 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,614 points. Launch price was $499.99.

NVIDIA

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,252 points. Launch price was $649.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) scores 15,614 and the RTX 2000E Ada Generation reaches 15,252 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) is built on Pascal while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Raw compute: 9.068 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1771 MHz vs 2130 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)RTX 2000E Ada Generation
G3D Mark Score
15,614+2%
15,252
Architecture
Pascal
Ada Lovelace
Process Node
16 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
2560
2816+10%
Compute (TFLOPS)
9.068 TFLOPS
12 TFLOPS+32%
Boost Clock
1771 MHz
2130 MHz+20%
ROPs
64+33%
48
TMUs
160+82%
88
L1 Cache
0.94 MB
2.8 MB+198%
L2 Cache
2 MB
12 MB+500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX 2000E Ada Generation supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) is capped at Upscaling support.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation carries 16 GB. RTX 2000E Ada Generation gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 320 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)) vs 224 GB/s (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — a 42.9% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel). Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) and 128-bit on the RTX 2000E Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)RTX 2000E Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
16 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5X
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s+43%
224 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
12 MB+500%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)RTX 2000E Ada Generation
DirectX
12.0
12.2+2%
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
1
4+300%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Encoder
NVENC 5.0
8th Gen NVENC
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP8
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel) draws 150W versus the RTX 2000E Ada Generation's 70W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)) vs 650W (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 167mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)RTX 2000E Ada Generation
TDP
150W
70W-53%
Recommended PSU
650W
650W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
167mm
Height
0mm
68mm
Slots
0-100%
1
Temp (Load)
85°C
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
104.1
217.9+109%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX 2000E Ada Generation (2024 vs 2016).

FeatureGeForce GTX 1080 (móvel)RTX 2000E Ada Generation
MSRP
$999
Codename
GP104
AD107
Release
August 15 2016
February 12 2024
Ranking
#180
#107

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.