
GeForce GTX 745 vs Radeon R9 M385

GeForce GTX 745
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M385
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M385
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 745 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M385.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 745 | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 745 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 745 holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $60), it costs 58% less, resulting in a 147.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 745 | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+147.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 745 and Radeon R9 M385

GeForce GTX 745
The GeForce GTX 745 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,126 points. Launch price was $119.

Radeon R9 M385
The Radeon R9 M385 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,061 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 745 scores 2,126 and the Radeon R9 M385 reaches 2,061 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 745 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon R9 M385 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GTX 745) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M385). Raw compute: 1.111 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 745) vs 1.792 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M385). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 1100 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 745 | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,126+3% | 2,061 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 896+75% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.111 TFLOPS | 1.792 TFLOPS+61% |
| Boost Clock | 1085 MHz | 1100 MHz+1% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 56+75% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+14% | 224 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 745 | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bandwidth: 80 GB/s (GeForce GTX 745) vs 96 GB/s (Radeon R9 M385) — a 20% advantage for the Radeon R9 M385. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 745) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M385) — the GeForce GTX 745 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 745 | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 96 GB/s+20% |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 745 draws 55W versus the Radeon R9 M385's 75W — a 30.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 745 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 745) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M385). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 745 | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-27% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 38.7+41% | 27.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 745 launched at $80 MSRP and currently averages $25, while the Radeon R9 M385 launched at $300 and now averages $60. The GeForce GTX 745 costs 58.3% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 85.0 (GeForce GTX 745) vs 34.4 (Radeon R9 M385) — the GeForce GTX 745 offers 147.1% better value. The Radeon R9 M385 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 745 | Radeon R9 M385 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-73% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-58% | $60 |
| Performance per Dollar | 85.0+147% | 34.4 |
| Codename | GM107 | Strato |
| Release | February 18 2014 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #559 | #674 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















