
GeForce GTX 745
Popular choices:

Radeon TM R9 A360
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 745
2014Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌83.3% higher power demand at 55W vs 30W.
- ❌14400% longer card at 145mm vs 1mm.
Radeon TM R9 A360
2015Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 55W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 145mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 745
2014Radeon TM R9 A360
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 55W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 145mm, a 144mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌83.3% higher power demand at 55W vs 30W.
- ❌14400% longer card at 145mm vs 1mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 745 better than Radeon TM R9 A360?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon TM R9 A360 make more sense than GeForce GTX 745?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 745 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 33 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 21 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 13 FPS | 8 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 16 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 9 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 5 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 3 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 2 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 1 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 745 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 49 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 20 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 18 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 12 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 8 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 7 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 5 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 4 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 2 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 745 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 23 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 745 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 96 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 64 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 32 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 16 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 745 and Radeon TM R9 A360

GeForce GTX 745
GeForce GTX 745
The GeForce GTX 745 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 18 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1020 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,126 points. Launch price was $119.

Radeon TM R9 A360
Radeon TM R9 A360
The Radeon TM R9 A360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 745 scores 2,126 and the Radeon TM R9 A360 reaches 2,060 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 745 is built on Maxwell while the Radeon TM R9 A360 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 512 (GeForce GTX 745) vs 512 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Raw compute: 1.111 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 745) vs 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon TM R9 A360). Boost clocks: 1085 MHz vs 925 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 745 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,126+3% | 2,060 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.111 TFLOPS+17% | 0.9472 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1085 MHz+17% | 925 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 745 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon TM R9 A360 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 745 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 745 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon TM R9 A360 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 745 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 745) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon TM R9 A360) — the GeForce GTX 745 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 745 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 745) vs 12_0 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 745 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4th Gen (GeForce GTX 745) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon TM R9 A360). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 745 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4th Gen | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 745 draws 55W versus the Radeon TM R9 A360's 30W — a 58.8% difference. The Radeon TM R9 A360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GTX 745) vs 350W (Radeon TM R9 A360). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 145mm vs 1mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 745 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 30W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 145mm | 1mm |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 38.7 | 68.7+78% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 745 launched at $80 MSRP, while the Radeon TM R9 A360 launched at $0. The Radeon TM R9 A360 costs 100+% less ($80 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.6 (GeForce GTX 745) vs Infinity (Radeon TM R9 A360) — the Radeon TM R9 A360 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon TM R9 A360 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 745 | Radeon TM R9 A360 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.6 | Infinity |
| Codename | GM107 | Tropo |
| Release | February 18 2014 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #559 | #711 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













