
GeForce GTX 780M SLI
Popular choices:

Radeon 840M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 780M SLI
2013Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.
Radeon 840M
2024Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 780M SLI
2013Radeon 840M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 200W, a 170W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3+ (2024) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌566.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 780M SLI better than Radeon 840M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 840M make more sense than GeForce GTX 780M SLI?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780M SLI | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 54 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 38 FPS | 29 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 24 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 23 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 15 FPS | 13 FPS |
| ultra | 13 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780M SLI | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 89 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 29 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 50 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 30 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 15 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 17 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 11 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 9 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 6 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780M SLI | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 174 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 130 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 87 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 780M SLI | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 133 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 109 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 71 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 36 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 780M SLI and Radeon 840M

GeForce GTX 780M SLI
GeForce GTX 780M SLI
The GeForce GTX 780M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 823 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,864 points.

Radeon 840M
Radeon 840M
The Radeon 840M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 2 2024. It features the RDNA 3+ architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,803 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 780M SLI scores 3,864 and the Radeon 840M reaches 3,803 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 780M SLI is built on Kepler while the Radeon 840M uses RDNA 3+, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 780M SLI) vs 256 (Radeon 840M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780M SLI | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,864+2% | 3,803 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 3+ |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+1100% | 256 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 780M SLI gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 840M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780M SLI | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780M SLI | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 160 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 780M SLI draws 200W versus the Radeon 840M's 30W — a 147.8% difference. The Radeon 840M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 780M SLI) vs 350W (Radeon 840M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 780M SLI | Radeon 840M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 30W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 90 |
| Perf/Watt | 19.3 | 126.8+557% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












