GeForce GTX 850M - MODDED
VS
GeForce GTX 1060

GeForce GTX 850M - MODDED vs GeForce GTX 1060

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 850M - MODDED

2014Core: Up to 936 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

2016Core: 1607 MHzBoost: 1733 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GTX 850M - MODDED is positioned at rank #324 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 850M - MODDED

#314
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
795%
#316
721%
#317
719%
#321
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
654%
#322
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
649%
#324
GeForce GTX 850M - MODDED
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#326
Iris Pro Graphics P580
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
99%
#327
Radeon E8870PCIe
MSRP: $250|Avg: $200
99%
#330
Arc Graphics 140T
MSRP: $350|Avg: $300
94%
#331
Radeon 680M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80
94%
#333
GeForce 730A
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
93%
#334
GeForce GT 745A
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
91%
#335
GeForce 710A
MSRP: $35|Avg: $62
91%
#336
90%
#338
GeForce MX230
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 821.6% higher G3D Mark score and 1100% more VRAM (6 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 850M - MODDED.

InsightGeForce GTX 850M - MODDEDGeForce GTX 1060
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-821.6%)
Leading raw performance (+821.6%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+1100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1060 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 850M - MODDED and GeForce GTX 1060

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 850M - MODDED

The GeForce GTX 850M - MODDED is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 12 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock speed is Up to 936 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,092 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1060

The GeForce GTX 1060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,064 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 850M - MODDED scores 1,092 versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 10,064 — the GeForce GTX 1060 leads by 821.6%. The GeForce GTX 850M - MODDED is built on Maxwell while the GeForce GTX 1060 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 640 (GeForce GTX 850M - MODDED) vs 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1060). Raw compute: 1.155 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 850M - MODDED) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060).

FeatureGeForce GTX 850M - MODDEDGeForce GTX 1060
G3D Mark Score
1,092
10,064+822%
Architecture
Maxwell
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
640
2560+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.155 TFLOPS
8.873 TFLOPS+668%
ROPs
16
64+300%
TMUs
40
160+300%
L1 Cache
320 KB
960 KB+200%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GTX 850M - MODDEDGeForce GTX 1060
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 850M - MODDED comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1060 offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 850M - MODDEDGeForce GTX 1060
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
6 GB+1100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
192 GB/s
Bus Width
128-bit
192-bit+50%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 850M - MODDED draws 45W versus the GeForce GTX 1060's 180W — a 120% difference. The GeForce GTX 850M - MODDED is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 850M - MODDED) vs 400W (GeForce GTX 1060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin.

FeatureGeForce GTX 850M - MODDEDGeForce GTX 1060
TDP
45W-75%
180W
Recommended PSU
350W-13%
400W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
6-pin
Length
173mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
24.3
55.9+130%
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1060 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2014).

FeatureGeForce GTX 850M - MODDEDGeForce GTX 1060
MSRP
$249
Avg Price (30d)
$60
Codename
GM107
GP104
Release
March 12 2014
May 27 2016
Ranking
#629
#137