
GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
Popular choices:

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
2015Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 28.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 100W vs 40W.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 980 (móvel): it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 100W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
2015Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
2023Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs Unknown).
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($250 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 980 (móvel): it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 100W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 28.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $250 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 100W vs 40W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, Unknown of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) better than Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS make more sense than GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 82 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 72 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 30 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 17 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 15 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 145 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 121 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 119 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 96 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 78 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 57 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 199 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 166 FPS | 158 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 110 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 83 FPS | 69 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 176 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 147 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 97 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 77 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 36 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
The GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 21 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1064 MHz to 1216 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,366 points. Launch price was $395.82.
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in October 26 2023. The boost clock speed is 1500 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,000 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) scores 7,366 versus the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS's 7,000 — the GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) leads by 5.2%. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)) vs 1,536 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Boost clocks: 1216 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 7,366+5% | 7,000 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+33% | 1536 |
| Boost Clock | 1216 MHz | 1500 MHz+23% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS has 0 MB. The GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)) vs 135 GB/s (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS) — a 65.9% advantage for the GeForce GTX 980 (móvel). Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 224 GB/s+66% | 135 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)) vs 12.1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs ES 3.2. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+44% | ES 3.2 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (2nd Gen) (GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)) vs Adreno VPU (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Decoder: NVDEC (2nd Gen) vs Adreno VPU. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (2nd Gen) | Adreno VPU |
| Decoder | NVDEC (2nd Gen) | Adreno VPU |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) draws 100W versus the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS's 40W — a 85.7% difference. The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)) vs 1W (Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 40W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Integrated |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 73.7 | 175.0+137% |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 (móvel) | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $250 |
| Codename | GM204 | — |
| Release | September 21 2015 | October 26 2023 |
| Ranking | #314 | #482 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












