GeForce GTX 980M SLI vs Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 980M SLI

2014Core: 1038 MHzBoost: 1127 MHz
Similar parts
··
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

2018Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1500 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GTX 980M SLI vs Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 980M SLI vs Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 980M SLI vs Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 980M SLI

2014

Why buy it

  • Draws 200W instead of 300W, a 100W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

  • 94.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • GeForce GTX 980M SLI is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: GCN 5.0 (2017−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
  • 50% higher power demand at 300W vs 200W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 94.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 980M SLI instead at 12,523 vs 12,258, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GTX 980M SLI vs Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 980M SLI

The GeForce GTX 980M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,523 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,258 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 980M SLI scores 12,523 and the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU reaches 12,258 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980M SLI is built on Maxwell while the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (GeForce GTX 980M SLI) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1127 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980M SLIRadeon Pro V520 MxGPU
G3D Mark Score
12,523+2%
12,258
Architecture
Maxwell
GCN 5.0
Process Node
28 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
3072
3584 ×2+17%
Boost Clock
1127 MHz
1500 MHz+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 980M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980M SLIRadeon Pro V520 MxGPU
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 980M SLI and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980M SLIRadeon Pro V520 MxGPU
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M SLI) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980M SLIRadeon Pro V520 MxGPU
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
OpenGL
4.4
4.6+5%
Max Displays
4
0
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (2x) (GeForce GTX 980M SLI) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980M SLI) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU).

FeatureGeForce GTX 980M SLIRadeon Pro V520 MxGPU
Encoder
NVENC 4.0 (2x)
VCE 4.1
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6 (2x)
UVD 7.2
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 980M SLI draws 200W versus the Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU's 300W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 980M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 980M SLI) vs 500W (Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980M SLIRadeon Pro V520 MxGPU
TDP
200W-33%
300W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
62.6+53%
40.9