
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
2020Why buy it
- ✅37.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅344.4% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (320 vs 72).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 63.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 320), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design vs GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,444 points.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design scores 13,444 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design leads by 25.1%. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 5.914 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1470 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 18 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) with 320 Tensor cores vs 72.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,444+25% | 10,749 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+11% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.914 TFLOPS | 6.774 TFLOPS+15% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1470 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 160+122% | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+9% | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40+122% | 18 |
| Tensor Cores | 320+344% | 72 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design has 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB carries 6 GB. GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 352 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 109.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design and 96-bit on the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 352 GB/s+110% | 168 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+167% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 13.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 160mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W | 70W-13% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 300W-40% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 160mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 168.1+9% | 153.6 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB (2024 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $169 |
| Codename | TU104 | GA107 |
| Release | April 2 2020 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #188 | #252 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















