GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
2020Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 400W, a 320W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $3,499 MSRP).
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
2021Why buy it
- ✅31.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($3,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌400% higher power demand at 400W vs 80W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design vs Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,444 points.
Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,182 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design scores 13,444 and the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot reaches 13,182 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 3,840 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Raw compute: 5.914 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1967 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 60 ×2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) with 320 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,444+2% | 13,182 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3840 ×2+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.914 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+155% |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1967 MHz+70% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96 ×2+50% |
| TMUs | 160 | 240 ×2+50% |
| L1 Cache | 2.5 MB+233% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 60 ×2+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 352 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot) — a 145.5% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design and 384-bit on the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 352 GB/s | 864 GB/s+145% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs VCN 4.0 (2x) (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Decoder: NVDEC 4th Gen vs VCN 4.0 (2x). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th Gen | VCN 4.0 (2x) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design draws 80W versus the Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot's 400W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 280mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 80W-80% | 400W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 280mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 168.1+409% | 33.0 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design | Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $3499 |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | April 2 2020 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #188 | #157 |
Search GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design on AmazonSearch Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot on AmazonAffiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design and Radeon PRO W7900 Dual Slot
