
GeForce RTX 2070
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2070
2018Why buy it
- ✅54.3% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (288 vs 72).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌254.4% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 175W vs 70W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $430 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 137.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 175W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 288), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
GeForce RTX 2070
2018GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
2024Why buy it
- ✅54.3% more average FPS across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅300% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (288 vs 72).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $430 less on MSRP ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 137.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 63.6 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($169 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 175W, a 105W reduction.
- ✅Measures 160mm instead of 267mm, a 107mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌254.4% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$169 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 63.6 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 175W vs 70W.
- ❌66.9% longer card at 267mm vs 160mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 across 29 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (72 vs 288), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2070 better than GeForce RTX 3050 6GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3050 6GB make more sense than GeForce RTX 2070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 152 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 117 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 98 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 81 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 63 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 42 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 184 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 122 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 85 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 64 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 723 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 542 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 362 FPS | 242 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 362 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 121 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 434 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 297 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 257 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 361 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 309 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 239 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 199 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 206 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 170 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 158 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 124 FPS | 55 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

GeForce RTX 2070
GeForce RTX 2070
The GeForce RTX 2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 17 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,068 points. Launch price was $499.

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 2 2024. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1042 MHz to 1470 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 18 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,749 points. Launch price was $179.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 2070 scores 16,068 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 10,749 — the GeForce RTX 2070 leads by 49.5%. The GeForce RTX 2070 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 2,304 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Raw compute: 7.465 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 6.774 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 1470 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 18 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) with 288 Tensor cores vs 72.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,068+49% | 10,749 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.465 TFLOPS+10% | 6.774 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1620 MHz+10% | 1470 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+100% | 72 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 2.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36+100% | 18 |
| Tensor Cores | 288+300% | 72 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB has 6 GB. The GeForce RTX 2070 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — a 166.7% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2070. Bus width: 256-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 2070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+167% | 168 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+167% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs NVENC (5th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs NVDEC (7th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | NVENC (5th Gen) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | NVDEC (7th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode Only) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 draws 175W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB's 70W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 300W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 160mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W | 70W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 300W-45% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 267mm | 160mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 91.8 | 153.6+67% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB launched at $169. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB costs 71.8% less ($430 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.8 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 63.6 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB) — the GeForce RTX 3050 6GB offers 137.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $169-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.8 | 63.6+137% |
| Codename | TU106 | GA107 |
| Release | October 17 2018 | February 2 2024 |
| Ranking | #129 | #252 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













