GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) vs Radeon Pro W5700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)

2025

Why buy it

✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 80W instead of 205W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Radeon Pro W5700

2019

Why buy it

✅33.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌156.3% higher power demand at 205W vs 80W.

GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)

2025

Radeon Pro W5700

2019

Why buy it

✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Blackwell (2024−2025) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 80W instead of 205W, a 125W reduction.

Why buy it

✅33.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌156.3% higher power demand at 205W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) better than Radeon Pro W5700?

Yes. GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) is clearly the better overall GPU here. Radeon Pro W5700 averages 33.1% more FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 15,014 vs 14,380 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) is a 2025 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon Pro W5700 is a 2019 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019, the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling, and a 4nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and you are getting lower estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 4.4% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro W5700 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon Pro W5700 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

Is Radeon Pro W5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro W5700 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $799 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro W5700 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro W5700
1080p
low	109 FPS	150 FPS
medium	91 FPS	132 FPS
high	77 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	96 FPS	127 FPS
medium	78 FPS	104 FPS
high	59 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	40 FPS	74 FPS
medium	35 FPS	62 FPS
high	23 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	19 FPS	41 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)Open Radeon Pro W5700

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro W5700
1080p
low	158 FPS	226 FPS
medium	120 FPS	190 FPS
high	80 FPS	138 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	99 FPS
1440p
low	101 FPS	146 FPS
medium	65 FPS	122 FPS
high	47 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	35 FPS	67 FPS
4K
low	49 FPS	78 FPS
medium	34 FPS	66 FPS
high	28 FPS	54 FPS
ultra	20 FPS	39 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)Open Radeon Pro W5700

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro W5700
1080p
low	659 FPS	647 FPS
medium	524 FPS	518 FPS
high	450 FPS	431 FPS
ultra	338 FPS	324 FPS
1440p
low	468 FPS	485 FPS
medium	384 FPS	388 FPS
high	325 FPS	324 FPS
ultra	253 FPS	243 FPS
4K
low	301 FPS	324 FPS
medium	246 FPS	259 FPS
high	188 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	139 FPS	162 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)Open Radeon Pro W5700

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro W5700
1080p
low	216 FPS	332 FPS
medium	183 FPS	284 FPS
high	148 FPS	235 FPS
ultra	123 FPS	196 FPS
1440p
low	172 FPS	275 FPS
medium	147 FPS	236 FPS
high	114 FPS	181 FPS
ultra	94 FPS	146 FPS
4K
low	92 FPS	147 FPS
medium	72 FPS	116 FPS
high	58 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	47 FPS	84 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)Open Radeon Pro W5700

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) and Radeon Pro W5700

GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)

The GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 2 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 975 MHz to 2287 MHz. It has 8192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,014 points.

Radeon Pro W5700

The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) scores 15,014 and the Radeon Pro W5700 reaches 14,380 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) is built on Blackwell 2.0 while the Radeon Pro W5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 8,192 (GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700). Boost clocks: 2287 MHz vs 1930 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro W5700
G3D Mark Score	15,014+4%	14,380
Architecture	Blackwell 2.0	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	4 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	8192+256%	2304
Boost Clock	2287 MHz+18%	1930 MHz

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro W5700
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro W5700
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro W5700
DirectX	12.2+2%	12.0
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro W5700
Encoder	7th Gen NVENC	VCN 2.0
Decoder	5th Gen NVDEC	VCN 2.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) draws 80W versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 205W — a 87.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2080 (Mobile)	Radeon Pro W5700
TDP	80W-61%	205W
Recommended PSU	650W	500W-23%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	267mm
Height	0mm	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85°C
Perf/Watt	187.7+168%	70.1