
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 275W, a 215W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
2015Why buy it
- ✅22.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌358.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 60W.
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
2023Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
2015Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 275W, a 215W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅22.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 15.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌358.3% higher power demand at 275W vs 60W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile better than Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 87 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 91 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 75 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 33 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 36 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 33 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 21 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 18 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 92 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 44 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 39 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 29 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 24 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 17 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 438 FPS |
| medium | 364 FPS | 351 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 292 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 219 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 342 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 273 FPS | 263 FPS |
| high | 228 FPS | 219 FPS |
| ultra | 171 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 228 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 152 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 110 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 133 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 171 FPS | 116 FPS |
| medium | 150 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 92 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 76 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 60 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 48 FPS | 36 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile and Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 6 2023. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1237 MHz to 1492 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,125 points.

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,741 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile scores 10,125 and the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X reaches 9,741 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X uses GCN 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile) vs 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Boost clocks: 1492 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,125+4% | 9,741 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 4096+60% |
| Boost Clock | 1492 MHz+42% | 1050 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 168 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile) vs 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) — a 204.8% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X. Bus width: 96-bit vs 4096-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM |
| Memory Bandwidth | 168 GB/s | 512 GB/s+205% |
| Bus Width | 96-bit | 4096-bit+4167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile) vs 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile draws 60W versus the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X's 275W — a 128.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile) vs 600W (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X). Power connectors: Mobile vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 195mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 65°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 60W-78% | 275W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 195mm |
| Height | 0mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 65°C-19% |
| Perf/Watt | 168.8+377% | 35.4 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $649 |
| Codename | GN20-P0-R 6 GB | Fiji |
| Release | January 6 2023 | June 24 2015 |
| Ranking | #271 | #282 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











