
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

GRID K160Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅+1997.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 225W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
GRID K160Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (628 vs 13,170).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌32.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 170W.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2022GRID K160Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅+1997.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 225W, a 55W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (628 vs 13,170).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌32.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 170W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU better than GRID K160Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID K160Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | GRID K160Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 7 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | GRID K160Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 248 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | GRID K160Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 593 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 7 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | GRID K160Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 565 FPS | 28 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 14 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 7 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU and GRID K160Q

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,170 points.

GRID K160Q
GRID K160Q
The GRID K160Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 628 points. Launch price was $937.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU scores 13,170 versus the GRID K160Q's 628 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU leads by 1997.1%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the GRID K160Q uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 1,536 (GRID K160Q). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K160Q).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | GRID K160Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,170+1997% | 628 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+133% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+457% | 2.289 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+2592% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID K160Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | GRID K160Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K160Q has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU offers 1100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K160Q) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | GRID K160Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+1100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU draws 170W versus the GRID K160Q's 225W — a 27.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 350W (GRID K160Q). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | GRID K160Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-24% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 77.5+2668% | 2.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | GRID K160Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $125 |
| Codename | GA106 | GK104 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #147 | #589 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













