
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Quadro 5000M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅+539.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌70% higher power demand at 170W vs 100W.
Quadro 5000M
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 170W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,060 vs 13,170).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2022Quadro 5000M
2010Why buy it
- ✅+539.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 170W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌70% higher power demand at 170W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,060 vs 13,170).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU better than Quadro 5000M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro 5000M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro 5000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 27 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 18 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 20 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 19 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 10 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro 5000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 194 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 17 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 8 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro 5000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 593 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 23 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro 5000M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 5 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU and Quadro 5000M

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,170 points.

Quadro 5000M
Quadro 5000M
The Quadro 5000M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 27 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 405 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU scores 13,170 versus the Quadro 5000M's 2,060 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU leads by 539.3%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the Quadro 5000M uses Fermi, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 320 (Quadro 5000M). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 0.5184 TFLOPS (Quadro 5000M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro 5000M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,170+539% | 2,060 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Fermi |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+1020% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+2358% | 0.5184 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+180% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+456% | 0.63 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro 5000M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro 5000M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 5000M has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro 5000M) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro 5000M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU draws 170W versus the Quadro 5000M's 100W — a 51.9% difference. The Quadro 5000M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 350W (Quadro 5000M). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro 5000M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 100W-41% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 77.5+276% | 20.6 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













