
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Quadro K6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅57.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 225W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
Quadro K6000
2013Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌32.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 170W.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2022Quadro K6000
2013Why buy it
- ✅57.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 225W, a 55W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,265 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,265 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 12 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌32.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 170W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU better than Quadro K6000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro K6000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 42 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 307 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 194 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 195 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 159 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 127 FPS | 30 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 93 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 18 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 593 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 90 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 163 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 43 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU and Quadro K6000

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,170 points.

Quadro K6000
Quadro K6000
The Quadro K6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 797 MHz to 902 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,993 points. Launch price was $5,265.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU scores 13,170 versus the Quadro K6000's 7,993 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU leads by 64.8%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the Quadro K6000 uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 2,880 (Quadro K6000). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Quadro K6000). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 902 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,170+65% | 7,993 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+24% | 2880 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+145% | 5.196 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+97% | 902 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 112 | 240+114% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+1422% | 0.23 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+100% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K6000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K6000 has 12 GB. The Quadro K6000 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 211 GB/s (Quadro K6000) — a 59.2% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 1.5 MB (Quadro K6000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+59% | 211 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+100% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 11.0 (Quadro K6000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs NVENC 1.0 (Quadro K6000). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264 (Quadro K6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | NVENC 1.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU draws 170W versus the Quadro K6000's 225W — a 27.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 350W (Quadro K6000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-24% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 265mm |
| Height | — | 110mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 77.5+118% | 35.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $5265 |
| Codename | GA106 | GK110B |
| Release | October 12 2022 | July 23 2013 |
| Ranking | #147 | #318 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













