
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 3000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅+21.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 260W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (112 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
Quadro RTX 3000
2018Why buy it
- ✅10.5% more average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅414.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 112).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,858 vs 13,170).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌52.9% higher power demand at 260W vs 170W.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2022Quadro RTX 3000
2018Why buy it
- ✅+21.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 260W, a 90W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅10.5% more average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 13.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅414.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (576 vs 112).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 3000 across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (112 vs 576), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 13.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,858 vs 13,170).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 6 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌52.9% higher power demand at 260W vs 170W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU better than Quadro RTX 3000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 3000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 248 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 296 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 86 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 593 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 366 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 244 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 122 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 565 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 326 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 366 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 244 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 244 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 122 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU and Quadro RTX 3000

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,170 points.

Quadro RTX 3000
Quadro RTX 3000
The Quadro RTX 3000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,858 points. Launch price was $9,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU scores 13,170 versus the Quadro RTX 3000's 10,858 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU leads by 21.3%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX 3000 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 4,608 (Quadro RTX 3000). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 16.31 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 3000). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1770 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 72 (Quadro RTX 3000) with 112 Tensor cores vs 576.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,170+21% | 10,858 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 4608+29% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS+28% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 112 | 288+157% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB | 4.5 MB+29% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 72+157% |
| Tensor Cores | 112 | 576+414% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX 3000) — the Quadro RTX 3000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.1 (Quadro RTX 3000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+40% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 3000). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 3000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU draws 170W versus the Quadro RTX 3000's 260W — a 41.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 3000). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-35% | 260W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 77.5+85% | 41.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 3000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $800 |
| Codename | GA106 | TU102 |
| Release | October 12 2022 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #147 | #78 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













