
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅+12.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌325% higher power demand at 170W vs 40W.
Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
2021Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 170W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,715 vs 13,170).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2022Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
2021Why buy it
- ✅+12.4% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 40W instead of 170W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌325% higher power demand at 170W vs 40W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,715 vs 13,170).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU better than Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 111 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 36 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 19 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 248 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 22 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 593 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 351 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 264 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 104 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 565 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 184 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 171 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 51 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU and Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,170 points.

Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)
The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1410 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,715 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU scores 13,170 versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)'s 11,715 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU leads by 12.4%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 896 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 2.527 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1410 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,170+12% | 11,715 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+300% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+404% | 2.527 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+26% | 1410 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+100% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+298% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) has 8 GB. The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 1 MB (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU draws 170W versus the Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)'s 40W — a 123.8% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile)). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Quadro RTX 4000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 40W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 77.5 | 292.9+278% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













