
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅14.6% more average FPS across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌88.9% higher power demand at 170W vs 90W.
Radeon PRO W6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 170W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2022Radeon PRO W6600M
2021Why buy it
- ✅14.6% more average FPS across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 90W instead of 170W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌88.9% higher power demand at 170W vs 90W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU across 36 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU better than Radeon PRO W6600M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon PRO W6600M still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 118 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 50 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 28 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 243 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 248 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 593 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 411 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 257 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 385 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 308 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 257 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 192 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 205 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 128 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 565 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 223 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 123 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 69 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU and Radeon PRO W6600M

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,170 points.

Radeon PRO W6600M
Radeon PRO W6600M
The Radeon PRO W6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1224 MHz to 2034 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 90W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,407 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU scores 13,170 versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 11,407 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU leads by 15.5%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 7.29 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600M). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2034 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W6600M) with 112 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,170+15% | 11,407 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+100% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+75% | 7.29 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2034 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 112 | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+600% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6600M has 8 GB. The Radeon PRO W6600M offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600M) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600M) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+50% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 5.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 5+25% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600M). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Radeon PRO W6600M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU draws 170W versus the Radeon PRO W6600M's 90W — a 61.5% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600M). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon PRO W6600M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 90W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 77.5 | 126.7+63% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













