
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon R9 M380
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅507.7% more average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.
Radeon R9 M380
2015Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2022Radeon R9 M380
2015Why buy it
- ✅507.7% more average FPS across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 170W, a 95W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 9.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
- ❌126.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 75W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU across 39 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU better than Radeon R9 M380?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon R9 M380 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 84 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 70 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 59 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 48 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 248 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 13 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 221 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 123 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 55 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 593 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 474 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 395 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 444 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 296 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 31 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 519 FPS | 110 FPS |
| medium | 439 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 376 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 296 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 425 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 356 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 296 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 222 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 277 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 237 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 198 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 148 FPS | 14 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU and Radeon R9 M380

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,170 points.

Radeon R9 M380
Radeon R9 M380
The Radeon R9 M380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,752 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU scores 13,170 versus the Radeon R9 M380's 2,752 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU leads by 378.6%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the Radeon R9 M380 uses GCN 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 768 (Radeon R9 M380). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M380). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,170+379% | 2,752 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+367% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+729% | 1.536 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+78% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+133% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+1742% | 0.19 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon R9 M380 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M380 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 96 GB/s (Radeon R9 M380) — a 250% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M380) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+50% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+250% | 96 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon R9 M380). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M380). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs UVD 6.0. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 (Radeon R9 M380).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | VCE 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | UVD 6.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),MPEG-2,VC-1,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU draws 170W versus the Radeon R9 M380's 75W — a 77.6% difference. The Radeon R9 M380 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M380). Power connectors: Mobile vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 75W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 77.5+111% | 36.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | Radeon R9 M380 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $300 |
| Codename | GA106 | Strato |
| Release | October 12 2022 | May 5 2015 |
| Ranking | #147 | #607 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













