
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2022Why buy it
- ✅0.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅27.3% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (112 vs 88).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (13,170 vs 14,923).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌240% higher power demand at 170W vs 50W.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2024Why buy it
- ✅+13.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 170W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (88 vs 112), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,170 points.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,923 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU scores 13,170 versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 14,923 — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU leads by 13.3%. The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU is built on Ampere while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 22 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 112 Tensor cores vs 88.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,170 | 14,923+13% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+27% | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+6% | 12 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2130 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 112+27% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+25% | 2.8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 12 MB+300% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28+27% | 22 |
| Tensor Cores | 112+27% | 88 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU has 6 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU carries 8 GB. RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 31.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU and 128-bit on the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+31% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 12 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (7th Gen) (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC (5th Gen) vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (7th Gen) | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC (5th Gen) | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,AV1 (Decode),VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU draws 170W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 50W — a 109.1% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU) vs 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 50W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 77.5 | 298.5+285% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














