GeForce RTX 3060 vs GeForce4 MX 4000

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060

2021Core: 1320 MHzBoost: 1777 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce4 MX 4000

2020Core: 1395 MHzBoost: 1575 MHz

GeForce RTX 3060 vs GeForce4 MX 4000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3060 vs GeForce4 MX 4000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3060 vs GeForce4 MX 4000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Why buy it

  • 14548.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • 580% higher power demand at 170W vs 25W.
  • 44% longer card at 242mm vs 168mm.

GeForce4 MX 4000

2020

Why buy it

  • Draws 25W instead of 170W, a 145W reduction.
  • Measures 168mm instead of 242mm, a 74mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2020 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14548.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 339800% in PassMark G3D (16,995 vs 5), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 12nm, and 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce RTX 3060 vs GeForce4 MX 4000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060

The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

NVIDIA

GeForce4 MX 4000

The GeForce4 MX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 1 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 1575 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the GeForce4 MX 4000's 5 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 339800%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the GeForce4 MX 4000 uses Turing, both on 8 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 896 (GeForce4 MX 4000). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 3.226 TFLOPS (GeForce4 MX 4000). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1575 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060GeForce4 MX 4000
G3D Mark Score
16,995+339800%
5
Architecture
Ampere
Turing
Process Node
8 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
3584+300%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
12.74 TFLOPS+295%
3.226 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1777 MHz+13%
1575 MHz
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
112+75%
64

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce4 MX 4000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060GeForce4 MX 4000
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce4 MX 4000 carries 512 MB. GeForce RTX 3060 gives you 2300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 and 64-bit on the GeForce4 MX 4000.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060GeForce4 MX 4000
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+2300%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
192-bit+200%
64-bit
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 7.0 (GeForce4 MX 4000). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060GeForce4 MX 4000
DirectX
12 Ultimate+71%
7.0
OpenGL
4.6+207%
1.5
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs None (GeForce4 MX 4000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs MPEG-2 Decoder. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce4 MX 4000).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060GeForce4 MX 4000
Encoder
NVENC 7th Gen
None
Decoder
NVDEC 5th Gen
MPEG-2 Decoder
Codecs
AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the GeForce4 MX 4000's 25W — a 148.7% difference. The GeForce4 MX 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (GeForce4 MX 4000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 60°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060GeForce4 MX 4000
TDP
170W
25W-85%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
242mm
168mm
Height
112mm
100mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
75
60°C-20%
Perf/Watt
100.0+49900%
0.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 came in at $329, while the GeForce4 MX 4000 launched at $0. On MSRP, GeForce4 MX 4000 was 100+% cheaper ($329 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs Infinity (GeForce4 MX 4000) — the GeForce4 MX 4000 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 (2021 vs 2020).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060GeForce4 MX 4000
MSRP
$329
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
51.7
Infinity
Codename
GA106
N17S-G5 / GP107-670-A1
Release
January 12 2021
August 1 2020
Ranking
#114
#523

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.