
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- β +209% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- β 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- β More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β1033.3% higher power demand at 170W vs 15W.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
2023Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 170W, a 155W reduction.
- β More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (5,500 vs 16,995).
- βLess VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- βWeaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
2023Why buy it
- β +209% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- β 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- β More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Draws 15W instead of 170W, a 155W reduction.
- β More future proof: Xe LPG (2023) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β1033.3% higher power demand at 170W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (5,500 vs 16,995).
- βLess VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- βWeaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 36 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 25 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 27 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 41 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 52 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 39 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 23 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 198 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 165 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 124 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 59 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 56 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 31 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)'s 5,500 β the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 209%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) uses Xe LPG, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1950 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+209% | 5,500 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Xe LPG |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+89500% | 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 1950 MHz+10% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+367% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12_2 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs QuickSync (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs QuickSync. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | QuickSync |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | QuickSync |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG2,AVC,VP9,HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)'s 15W β a 167.6% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 15W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0 | 366.7+267% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) launched at $0. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) costs 100+% less ($329 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs Infinity (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc)) β the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) offers Infinity% better value. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7 | Infinity |
| Codename | GA106 | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Release | January 12 2021 | December 14 2023 |
| Ranking | #114 | #495 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












