
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

GRID K140Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+2234.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 787% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GRID K140Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $204 less on MSRP ($125 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (728 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021GRID K140Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅+2234.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 787% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 5.8 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $125 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅2300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 512 MB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $204 less on MSRP ($125 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (728 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($125 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than GRID K140Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID K140Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 8 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 12 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 7 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 8 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 13 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 8 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and GRID K140Q

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

GRID K140Q
GRID K140Q
The GRID K140Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 728 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the GRID K140Q's 728 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 2234.5%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the GRID K140Q uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1,536 (GRID K140Q). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K140Q).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+2234% | 728 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+133% | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+457% | 2.289 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 128+14% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+2592% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID K140Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K140Q has 512 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 2300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K140Q) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+2300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 11_0 (GRID K140Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+9% | 11_0 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs NVENC 3rd Gen (GRID K140Q). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC 3rd Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the GRID K140Q's 225W — a 27.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (GRID K140Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-24% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+3025% | 3.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the GRID K140Q launched at $125. The GRID K140Q costs 62% less ($204 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 5.8 (GRID K140Q) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 791.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | GRID K140Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $125-62% |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+791% | 5.8 |
| Codename | GA106 | GK104 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #114 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












