G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Why buy it

✅+568.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $171 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 916.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.

GRID K240Q

2013

Why buy it

✅Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,541 vs 16,995).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
52% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$329 MSRP

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

GRID K240Q

2013

Why buy it

✅+568.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $171 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 916.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).

Why buy it

✅Measures 1mm instead of 242mm, a 241mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌24100% longer card at 242mm vs 1mm.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,541 vs 16,995).
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Very weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
❌
52% HIGHER MSRP
$500 MSRPvs$329 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than GRID K240Q?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 16,995 vs 2,541 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 is a 2021 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while GRID K240Q is a 2013 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2013, 568.8% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 2 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3060 is about $171 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $500 MSRP, and you are getting 568.8% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 916.5%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is GRID K240Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GRID K240Q is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $500 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3060 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Benchmark Check

GRID K240Q Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	GRID K240Q
1080p
low	149 FPS	102 FPS
medium	131 FPS	83 FPS
high	118 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	38 FPS
1440p
low	126 FPS	85 FPS
medium	104 FPS	69 FPS
high	92 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	28 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	28 FPS
medium	58 FPS	26 FPS
high	39 FPS	17 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	15 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open GRID K240Q

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	GRID K240Q
1080p
low	354 FPS	88 FPS
medium	310 FPS	62 FPS
high	249 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	32 FPS
1440p
low	222 FPS	48 FPS
medium	196 FPS	31 FPS
high	160 FPS	23 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	17 FPS
4K
low	110 FPS	18 FPS
medium	94 FPS	12 FPS
high	77 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	7 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open GRID K240Q

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	GRID K240Q
1080p
low	765 FPS	114 FPS
medium	612 FPS	91 FPS
high	510 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	57 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	86 FPS
medium	432 FPS	69 FPS
high	366 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	287 FPS	43 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	57 FPS
medium	298 FPS	46 FPS
high	221 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	29 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open GRID K240Q

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	GRID K240Q
1080p
low	523 FPS	114 FPS
medium	452 FPS	91 FPS
high	383 FPS	76 FPS
ultra	319 FPS	57 FPS
1440p
low	428 FPS	86 FPS
medium	371 FPS	69 FPS
high	298 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	43 FPS
4K
low	279 FPS	57 FPS
medium	259 FPS	46 FPS
high	225 FPS	38 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	29 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open GRID K240Q

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and GRID K240Q

GeForce RTX 3060

The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

GRID K240Q

The GRID K240Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,541 points. Launch price was $469.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the GRID K240Q's 2,541 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 568.8%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the GRID K240Q uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1,536 (GRID K240Q). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID K240Q).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	GRID K240Q
G3D Mark Score	16,995+569%	2,541
Architecture	Ampere	Kepler
Process Node	8 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3584+133%	1536
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.74 TFLOPS+457%	2.289 TFLOPS
ROPs	48+50%	32
TMUs	112	128+14%
L1 Cache	3.5 MB+2592%	0.13 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+500%	0.5 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID K240Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	GRID K240Q
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GRID K240Q has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.5 MB (GRID K240Q) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	GRID K240Q
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+500%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Bus Width	192-bit+200%	64-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+500%	0.5 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 11_0 (GRID K240Q). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	GRID K240Q
DirectX	12 Ultimate+9%	11_0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GRID K240Q).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	GRID K240Q
Encoder	NVENC 7th Gen	—
Decoder	NVDEC 5th Gen	—
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the GRID K240Q's 225W — a 27.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (GRID K240Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	GRID K240Q
TDP	170W-24%	225W
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	1mm
Height	112mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	100.0+785%	11.3

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the GRID K240Q launched at $500. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 34.2% less ($171 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 5.1 (GRID K240Q) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 913.7% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).