
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

GRID M10-4Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+470.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,476 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4767.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GRID M10-4Q
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,977 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌752.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,805 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060
2021GRID M10-4Q
2016Why buy it
- ✅+470.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $2,476 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 4767.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 1.1 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,805 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,977 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌752.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,805 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than GRID M10-4Q?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GRID M10-4Q still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 11 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 14 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 36 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 12 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 5 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 33 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 80 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and GRID M10-4Q

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

GRID M10-4Q
GRID M10-4Q
The GRID M10-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,977 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the GRID M10-4Q's 2,977 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 470.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the GRID M10-4Q uses Maxwell, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 640 (GRID M10-4Q). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1.672 TFLOPS (GRID M10-4Q). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+471% | 2,977 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+460% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+662% | 1.672 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+36% | 1306 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+180% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+1029% | 0.31 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The GRID M10-4Q relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GRID M10-4Q has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2 MB (GRID M10-4Q) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the GRID M10-4Q's 225W — a 27.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (GRID M10-4Q). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-24% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+658% | 13.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the GRID M10-4Q launched at $2805. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 88.3% less ($2476 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1.1 (GRID M10-4Q) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 4600% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | GRID M10-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-88% | $2805 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+4600% | 1.1 |
| Codename | GA106 | GM107 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #114 | #622 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












