
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro A30M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- β +189.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- β 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- β More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β240% higher power demand at 170W vs 50W.
Intel Arc Pro A30M
2022Why buy it
- β Draws 50W instead of 170W, a 120W reduction.
- β More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022β2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (5,862 vs 16,995).
- βLess VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- βWeaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Intel Arc Pro A30M
2022Why buy it
- β +189.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- β Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- β 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- β More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Draws 50W instead of 170W, a 120W reduction.
- β More future proof: Generation 12.7 (2022β2023) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β240% higher power demand at 170W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (5,862 vs 16,995).
- βLess VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- βWeaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Intel Arc Pro A30M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Intel Arc Pro A30M make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 31 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 25 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 19 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 60 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 264 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 211 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 132 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 54 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Intel Arc Pro A30M

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Intel Arc Pro A30M
Intel Arc Pro A30M
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 5,862 β the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 189.9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Intel Arc Pro A30M uses Generation 12.7, both on 8 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 8 (Intel Arc Pro A30M) with 112 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+190% | 5,862 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+250% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+211% | 4.096 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2000 MHz+13% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+75% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28+250% | 8 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro A30M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro A30M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro A30M) β the Intel Arc Pro A30M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 50W β a 109.1% difference. The Intel Arc Pro A30M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 50W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | β |
| Height | 112mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0 | 117.2+17% |
Value Analysis
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | β |
| Codename | GA106 | DG2-128 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | August 8 2022 |
| Ranking | #114 | #402 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












