
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- β +1350.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 561.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- β Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- β466.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 30W.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013Why buy it
- β Costs $179 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β Draws 30W instead of 170W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,172 vs 16,995).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.8 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Iris Pro Graphics 5200
2013Why buy it
- β +1350.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- β Delivers 561.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 7.8 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- β Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- β 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).
- β More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- β Costs $179 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β Draws 30W instead of 170W, a 140W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β466.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 30W.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark G3D performance (1,172 vs 16,995).
- βLess VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βNo DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- βVery weak future-proofing: 2013-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.8 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Iris Pro Graphics 5200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Iris Pro Graphics 5200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 7 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 9 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 32 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 26 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 20 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 21 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 13 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 53 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 42 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 24 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 8 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 3 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in May 27 2013. It features the Generation 7.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 200 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 22 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,172 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 1,172 β the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 1350.1%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses Generation 7.5, both on 8 nm vs 22 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 320 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.768 TFLOPS (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+1350% | 1,172 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Generation 7.5 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 22 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+1020% | 320 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+1559% | 0.768 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+48% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+1100% | 4 |
| TMUs | 112+180% | 40 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 0 MB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Iris Pro Graphics 5200's 30W β a 140% difference. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1W (Iris Pro Graphics 5200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 30W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 242mm | β |
| Height | 112mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | β |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+156% | 39.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Iris Pro Graphics 5200 launched at $150. The Iris Pro Graphics 5200 costs 54.4% less ($179 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 7.8 (Iris Pro Graphics 5200) β the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 562.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $150-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+563% | 7.8 |
| Codename | GA106 | Haswell GT3e |
| Release | January 12 2021 | May 27 2013 |
| Ranking | #114 | #835 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












