GeForce RTX 3060 vs Quadro 2000

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060

2021Core: 1320 MHzBoost: 1777 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro 2000

2010Core: 625 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 3060 vs Quadro 2000 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3060 vs Quadro 2000 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3060 vs Quadro 2000: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Why buy it

  • 1274.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $270 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 3164% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 1.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 1100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 174.2% higher power demand at 170W vs 62W.
  • 36% longer card at 242mm vs 178mm.

Quadro 2000

2010

Why buy it

  • Draws 62W instead of 170W, a 108W reduction.
  • Measures 178mm instead of 242mm, a 64mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 82.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $599 MSRPvs$329 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1274.1% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1692.7% in PassMark G3D (16,995 vs 948), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 1 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 40nm, and 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $270 cheaper on MSRP at $329 vs $599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3164% (51.7 vs 1.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3060 vs Quadro 2000 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060

The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

NVIDIA

Quadro 2000

The Quadro 2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 948 points. Launch price was $599.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Quadro 2000's 948 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 1692.7%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Quadro 2000 uses Fermi, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 192 (Quadro 2000). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Quadro 2000
G3D Mark Score
16,995+1693%
948
Architecture
Ampere
Fermi
Process Node
8 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
3584+1767%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
12.74 TFLOPS+2554%
0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs
48+200%
16
TMUs
112+250%
32
L1 Cache
3.5 MB+1300%
0.25 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB+1100%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro 2000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Quadro 2000
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 carries 1 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 gives you 1100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 and 64-bit on the Quadro 2000. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro 2000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Quadro 2000
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+1100%
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
192-bit+200%
64-bit
L2 Cache
3 MB+1100%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 11_0 (Quadro 2000). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Quadro 2000
DirectX
12 Ultimate+9%
11_0
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs NVENC 1st Gen (Quadro 2000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VP4.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Quadro 2000
Encoder
NVENC 7th Gen
NVENC 1st Gen
Decoder
NVDEC 5th Gen
VP4
Codecs
AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Quadro 2000's 62W — a 93.1% difference. The Quadro 2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (Quadro 2000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 178mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Quadro 2000
TDP
170W
62W-64%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
242mm
178mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
100.0+554%
15.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 came in at $329, while the Quadro 2000 launched at $599. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3060 was 45.1% cheaper ($270 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1.6 (Quadro 2000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 3131.3% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 (2021 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Quadro 2000
MSRP
$329-45%
$599
Performance per Dollar
51.7+3131%
1.6
Codename
GA106
GF106
Release
January 12 2021
December 24 2010
Ranking
#114
#902

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.