GeForce RTX 3060 vs Quadro CX

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060

2021Core: 1320 MHzBoost: 1777 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro CX

2008Core: 602 MHz

GeForce RTX 3060 vs Quadro CX Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3060 vs Quadro CX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3060 vs Quadro CX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Why buy it

  • 986.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $1,670 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 10804.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quadro CX

2008

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
  • 2008 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 507.6% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,999 MSRPvs$329 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 986.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1694.6% in PassMark G3D (16,995 vs 947), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 4 GB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 8nm process instead of 55nm, and 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,670 cheaper on MSRP at $329 vs $1,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 10804.1% (51.7 vs 0.5), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3060 vs Quadro CX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060

The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

NVIDIA

Quadro CX

The Quadro CX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points. Launch price was $1,999.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Quadro CX's 947 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 1694.6%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Quadro CX uses Tesla 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 192 (Quadro CX). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro CX).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Quadro CX
G3D Mark Score
16,995+1695%
947
Architecture
Ampere
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
8 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
3584+1767%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
12.74 TFLOPS+2656%
0.4623 TFLOPS
ROPs
48+100%
24
TMUs
112+75%
64
L2 Cache
3 MB+1479%
0.19 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro CX leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Quadro CX
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro CX carries 4 GB. GeForce RTX 3060 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 and 64-bit on the Quadro CX. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro CX) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Quadro CX
VRAM Capacity
12 GB+200%
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
192-bit+200%
64-bit
L2 Cache
3 MB+1479%
0.19 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 11.1 (10_0) (Quadro CX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Quadro CX
DirectX
12 Ultimate+8%
11.1 (10_0)
Vulkan
1.3
N/A
OpenGL
4.6+39%
3.3
Max Displays
4+100%
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs None (Quadro CX). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro CX).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Quadro CX
Encoder
NVENC 7th Gen
None
Decoder
NVDEC 5th Gen
PureVideo HD
Codecs
AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Quadro CX's 150W — a 12.5% difference. The Quadro CX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (Quadro CX). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Quadro CX
TDP
170W
150W-12%
Recommended PSU
550W
350W-36%
Power Connector
8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
242mm
267mm
Height
112mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75-6%
80
Perf/Watt
100.0+1487%
6.3
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 came in at $329, while the Quadro CX launched at $1999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3060 was 83.5% cheaper ($1670 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.5 (Quadro CX) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 10240% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 (2021 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Quadro CX
MSRP
$329-84%
$1999
Performance per Dollar
51.7+10240%
0.5
Codename
GA106
GT200B
Release
January 12 2021
November 11 2008
Ranking
#114
#901

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.