
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Quadro CX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+1694.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,670 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10804.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quadro CX
2008Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (947 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌507.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Quadro CX
2008Why buy it
- ✅+1694.6% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,670 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10804.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0.5 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (947 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2008-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌507.6% HIGHER MSRP$1,999 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Quadro CX?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro CX still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 13 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 9 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 3 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 9 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 1 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 4 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 2 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 1 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 14 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 7 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 16 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 2 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 32 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 16 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 21 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 11 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 43 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 34 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 21 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 8 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 5 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 4 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 5 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 4 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 3 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Quadro CX

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Quadro CX
Quadro CX
The Quadro CX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 602 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 947 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Quadro CX's 947 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 1694.6%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Quadro CX uses Tesla 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 192 (Quadro CX). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.4623 TFLOPS (Quadro CX).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+1695% | 947 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+1767% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+2656% | 0.4623 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+100% | 24 |
| TMUs | 112+75% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+1479% | 0.19 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro CX relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro CX has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.19 MB (Quadro CX) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+1479% | 0.19 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 11.1 (10_0) (Quadro CX). Vulkan: 1.3 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate+8% | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 4+100% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs None (Quadro CX). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs PureVideo HD. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Quadro CX).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | None |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | PureVideo HD |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Quadro CX's 150W — a 12.5% difference. The Quadro CX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (Quadro CX). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 150W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+1487% | 6.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Quadro CX launched at $1999. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 83.5% less ($1670 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.5 (Quadro CX) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 10240% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro CX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-84% | $1999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+10240% | 0.5 |
| Codename | GA106 | GT200B |
| Release | January 12 2021 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #114 | #901 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












