
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Quadro K4200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+292.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌57.4% higher power demand at 170W vs 108W.
Quadro K4200
2014Why buy it
- ✅Draws 108W instead of 170W, a 62W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,332 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Quadro K4200
2014Why buy it
- ✅+292.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 108W instead of 170W, a 62W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 242mm, a 1mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌57.4% higher power demand at 170W vs 108W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,332 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2014-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Quadro K4200?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro K4200 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 25 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 15 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 13 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 44 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 17 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 11 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 6 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 97 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 49 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 24 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Quadro K4200

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Quadro K4200
Quadro K4200
The Quadro K4200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 22 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 771 MHz to 784 MHz. It has 1344 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 108W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,332 points. Launch price was $854.99.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Quadro K4200's 4,332 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 292.3%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Quadro K4200 uses Kepler, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1,344 (Quadro K4200). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2.107 TFLOPS (Quadro K4200). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 784 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+292% | 4,332 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Kepler |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+167% | 1344 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+505% | 2.107 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+127% | 784 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112 | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+3082% | 0.11 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro K4200 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro K4200 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro K4200) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12_0 (Quadro K4200). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12_0 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs NVENC 2nd Gen (Quadro K4200). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC 1st Gen.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC 2nd Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC 1st Gen |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Quadro K4200's 108W — a 44.6% difference. The Quadro K4200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (Quadro K4200). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 108W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 241mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+149% | 40.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Quadro K4200 launched at $0. The Quadro K4200 costs 100+% less ($329 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs Infinity (Quadro K4200) — the Quadro K4200 offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro K4200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7 | Infinity |
| Codename | GA106 | GK104 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | July 22 2014 |
| Ranking | #114 | #475 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












