
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Quadro M6000 24GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+46.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $4,670 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2121.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro M6000 24GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,625 vs 16,995).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1419.5% HIGHER MSRP$4,999 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Quadro M6000 24GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅+46.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $4,670 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 2121.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 2.3 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (11,625 vs 16,995).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 24 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1419.5% HIGHER MSRP$4,999 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.3 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Quadro M6000 24GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro M6000 24GB still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 160 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 61 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 62 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 52 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 392 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 262 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 209 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 131 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 233 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 157 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 125 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 52 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Quadro M6000 24GB

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Quadro M6000 24GB
Quadro M6000 24GB
The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 11,625 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 46.2%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Quadro M6000 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+46% | 11,625 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+17% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+86% | 6.844 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+60% | 1114 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 112 | 256+129% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+218% | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro M6000 24GB relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 24GB has 24 GB. The Quadro M6000 24GB offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000 24GB) — a 13.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 24 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s+14% | 317 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12/1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 250W — a 38.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-32% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+115% | 46.5 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Quadro M6000 24GB launched at $4999. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 93.4% less ($4670 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2.3 (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 2147.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-93% | $4999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+2148% | 2.3 |
| Codename | GA106 | GM200 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | March 5 2016 |
| Ranking | #114 | #233 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












