
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Quadro P520
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+735.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 280.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 13.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌844.4% higher power demand at 170W vs 18W.
Quadro P520
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $179 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 18W instead of 170W, a 152W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,034 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Quadro P520
2019Why buy it
- ✅+735.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 280.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 13.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $179 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 18W instead of 170W, a 152W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌844.4% higher power demand at 170W vs 18W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (2,034 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Quadro P520?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P520 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 22 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 15 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 9 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 6 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 6 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 3 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 2 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 6 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 3 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 2 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 1 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 48 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 23 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 17 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 12 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 8 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 7 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 5 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 3 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 23 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 46 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 34 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 37 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 23 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Quadro P520

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Quadro P520
Quadro P520
The Quadro P520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 23 2019. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1303 MHz to 1493 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,034 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Quadro P520's 2,034 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 735.5%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Quadro P520 uses Pascal, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 384 (Quadro P520). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1.147 TFLOPS (Quadro P520). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1493 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+736% | 2,034 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Pascal |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+833% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+1011% | 1.147 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+19% | 1493 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+367% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+2400% | 0.14 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P520 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P520 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.5 MB (Quadro P520) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+500% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Quadro P520's 18W — a 161.7% difference. The Quadro P520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (Quadro P520). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 18W-89% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0 | 113.0+13% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Quadro P520 launched at $150. The Quadro P520 costs 54.4% less ($179 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 13.6 (Quadro P520) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 280.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro P520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $150-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+280% | 13.6 |
| Codename | GA106 | GP108 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | May 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #114 | #677 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












