
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Quadro RTX A6000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,320 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 953.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 300W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (112 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Quadro RTX A6000
2020Why buy it
- ✅62.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 112).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌1313.1% HIGHER MSRP$4,649 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌76.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 170W.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Quadro RTX A6000
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,320 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 953.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $4,649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 300W, a 130W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅62.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅200% more Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation, which can increase overall FPS in supported games (336 vs 112).
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (48 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX A6000 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 48 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Fewer Tensor Cores for AI-powered features like DLSS and frame generation (112 vs 336), which can reduce FPS gains in supported games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌1313.1% HIGHER MSRP$4,649 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($4,649 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌76.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 170W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro RTX A6000 better than GeForce RTX 3060?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce RTX 3060 make more sense than Quadro RTX A6000?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 175 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 661 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 331 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 261 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 158 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 929 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 759 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 675 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 586 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 256 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 855 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 784 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 684 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 513 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 679 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 616 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 513 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 410 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 256 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Quadro RTX A6000

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Quadro RTX A6000
Quadro RTX A6000
The Quadro RTX A6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1800 MHz. It has 10752 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,798 points. Launch price was $4,649.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 22,798 — the Quadro RTX A6000 leads by 34.1%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Quadro RTX A6000 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 10,752 (Quadro RTX A6000). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 38.71 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX A6000). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1800 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 84 (Quadro RTX A6000) with 112 Tensor cores vs 336.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995 | 22,798+34% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 10752+200% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS | 38.71 TFLOPS+204% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 1800 MHz+1% |
| ROPs | 48 | 112+133% |
| TMUs | 112 | 336+200% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB | 10.5 MB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 84+200% |
| Tensor Cores | 112 | 336+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The Quadro RTX A6000 supports the newer Upscaling support, whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 is capped at DLSS 2 Super Resolution.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX A6000 has 48 GB. The Quadro RTX A6000 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 768 GB/s (Quadro RTX A6000) — a 113.3% advantage for the Quadro RTX A6000. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 6 MB (Quadro RTX A6000) — the Quadro RTX A6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 48 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 768 GB/s+113% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12 Ultimate (Quadro RTX A6000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs NVENC (7th Gen) (Quadro RTX A6000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Quadro RTX A6000).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC (7th Gen) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Quadro RTX A6000's 300W — a 55.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 500W (Quadro RTX A6000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin EPS. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-43% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin EPS |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+32% | 76.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Quadro RTX A6000 launched at $4649. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 92.9% less ($4320 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 4.9 (Quadro RTX A6000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 955.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Quadro RTX A6000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-93% | $4649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+955% | 4.9 |
| Codename | GA106 | GA102 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | October 5 2020 |
| Ranking | #114 | #54 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












