G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Why buy it

✅+133.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $271 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 325.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 12.1 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

❌174.2% higher power demand at 170W vs 62W.

Quadro T2000

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 62W instead of 170W, a 108W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,279 vs 16,995).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
82.4% HIGHER MSRP
$600 MSRPvs$329 MSRP

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Quadro T2000

2010

Why buy it

✅+133.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Costs $271 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Delivers 325.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 12.1 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).

Why buy it

✅Draws 62W instead of 170W, a 108W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌174.2% higher power demand at 170W vs 62W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (7,279 vs 16,995).
❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2010-era hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌
82.4% HIGHER MSRP
$600 MSRPvs$329 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Quadro T2000?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 16,995 vs 7,279 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 3060 is a 2021 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Quadro T2000 is a 2010 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2010, 133.5% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 4 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 3060 is the smarter buy today, but it is not as lopsided as a simple winner label makes it sound. GeForce RTX 3060 is about $271 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $600 MSRP, and you are getting 133.5% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 325.8%. That is why the better overall card still comes out as the smarter buy today, not just the faster one.

Is Quadro T2000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Quadro T2000 is still a strong modern gaming GPU: it is still comfortable for 1080p and decent for 1440p, though 4K is more situational. It remains a good buy when you can get it meaningfully cheaper than the alternative around $600 MSRP, even if GeForce RTX 3060 is still the cleaner recommendation on overall value today.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Benchmark Check

Quadro T2000 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Quadro T2000
1080p
low	149 FPS	24 FPS
medium	131 FPS	16 FPS
high	118 FPS	9 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	5 FPS
1440p
low	126 FPS	11 FPS
medium	104 FPS	6 FPS
high	92 FPS	3 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	2 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	4 FPS
medium	58 FPS	3 FPS
high	39 FPS	1 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	1 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Quadro T2000

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Quadro T2000
1080p
low	354 FPS	74 FPS
medium	310 FPS	49 FPS
high	249 FPS	34 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	26 FPS
1440p
low	222 FPS	49 FPS
medium	196 FPS	29 FPS
high	160 FPS	22 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	17 FPS
4K
low	110 FPS	26 FPS
medium	94 FPS	16 FPS
high	77 FPS	12 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	9 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Quadro T2000

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Quadro T2000
1080p
low	765 FPS	147 FPS
medium	612 FPS	123 FPS
high	510 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	56 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	117 FPS
medium	432 FPS	97 FPS
high	366 FPS	53 FPS
ultra	287 FPS	42 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	75 FPS
medium	298 FPS	65 FPS
high	221 FPS	32 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	23 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Quadro T2000

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Quadro T2000
1080p
low	523 FPS	60 FPS
medium	452 FPS	45 FPS
high	383 FPS	25 FPS
ultra	319 FPS	16 FPS
1440p
low	428 FPS	6 FPS
medium	371 FPS	5 FPS
high	298 FPS	4 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	2 FPS
4K
low	279 FPS	4 FPS
medium	259 FPS	3 FPS
high	225 FPS	2 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	1 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Quadro T2000

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Quadro T2000

GeForce RTX 3060

The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Quadro T2000

The Quadro T2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 24 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,279 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Quadro T2000's 7,279 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 133.5%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Quadro T2000 uses Fermi, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 192 (Quadro T2000). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro T2000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Quadro T2000
G3D Mark Score	16,995+133%	7,279
Architecture	Ampere	Fermi
Process Node	8 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	3584+1767%	192
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.74 TFLOPS+2554%	0.48 TFLOPS
ROPs	48+200%	16
TMUs	112+250%	32
L1 Cache	3.5 MB+1300%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+1100%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro T2000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Quadro T2000
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T2000 has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro T2000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Quadro T2000
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit	256-bit+33%
L2 Cache	3 MB+1100%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Quadro T2000
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs NVENC 7.0 (Quadro T2000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs PureVideo HD VP9. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro T2000).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Quadro T2000
Encoder	NVENC 7th Gen	NVENC 7.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th Gen	PureVideo HD VP9
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Quadro T2000's 62W — a 93.1% difference. The Quadro T2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (Quadro T2000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Quadro T2000
TDP	170W	62W-64%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	0mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75	—
Perf/Watt	100.0	117.4+17%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Quadro T2000 launched at $600. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 45.2% less ($271 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.1 (Quadro T2000) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 327.3% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2010).