
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Radeon 780M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+146.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌1033.3% higher power demand at 170W vs 15W.
Radeon 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 170W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,906 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Radeon 780M
2024Why buy it
- ✅+146.1% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 4 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 170W, a 155W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 4nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌1033.3% higher power demand at 170W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (6,906 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon 780M?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon 780M make more sense than GeForce RTX 3060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 43 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 68 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 51 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 29 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 27 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 18 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 16 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 32 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 23 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 25 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 13 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 137 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 59 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 33 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon 780M

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon 780M
Radeon 780M
The Radeon 780M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 800 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 6,906 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon 780M's 6,906 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 146.1%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon 780M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 768 (Radeon 780M). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 8.909 TFLOPS (Radeon 780M). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2900 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12 (Radeon 780M) with 112 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+146% | 6,906 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+367% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+43% | 8.909 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2900 MHz+63% |
| ROPs | 48+50% | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+133% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+1300% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28+133% | 12 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon 780M relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 780M has 4 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2 MB (Radeon 780M) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+200% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.2 (Radeon 780M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon 780M). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 780M).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon 780M's 15W — a 167.6% difference. The Radeon 780M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (Radeon 780M). Power connectors: 8-pin vs None. Card length: 242mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 15W-91% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | None |
| Length | 242mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0 | 460.4+360% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 780M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon 780M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | — |
| Codename | GA106 | Phoenix |
| Release | January 12 2021 | January 31 2024 |
| Ranking | #114 | #359 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












