
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 465
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+274.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $171 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 469.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 9.1 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌385.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 35W.
Radeon Pro 465
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 170W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,538 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌52% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Radeon Pro 465
2016Why buy it
- ✅+274.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $171 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 469.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 9.1 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅500% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 2 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 170W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌385.7% higher power demand at 170W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (4,538 vs 16,995).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Very weak future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already obsolete for modern gaming and is hard to recommend today.
- ❌52% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon Pro 465?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 465 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 46 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 28 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 20 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 10 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 30 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 18 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 10 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 5 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 11 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 4 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 3 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 19 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 23 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 11 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 10 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 7 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 6 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 4 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 51 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 87 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 70 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 59 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 45 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 25 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon Pro 465

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon Pro 465
Radeon Pro 465
The Radeon Pro 465 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 30 2016. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 907 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,538 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon Pro 465's 4,538 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 274.5%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 465 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1,024 (Radeon Pro 465). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1.858 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 465). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 907 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+275% | 4,538 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+250% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+586% | 1.858 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+96% | 907 MHz |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 112+75% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+1300% | 0.25 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 465 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 465 has 2 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro 465) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+500% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+200% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon Pro 465's 35W — a 131.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 465 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 465). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 35W-79% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0 | 129.7+30% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 465 launched at $500. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 34.2% less ($171 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 9.1 (Radeon Pro 465) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 468.1% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 465 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-34% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+468% | 9.1 |
| Codename | GA106 | Baffin |
| Release | January 12 2021 | October 30 2016 |
| Ranking | #114 | #547 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












