
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro 5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅53.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 259.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌30.8% higher power demand at 170W vs 130W.
Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 170W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌142.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Radeon Pro 5700
2020Why buy it
- ✅53.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 259.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 14.4 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 130W instead of 170W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌30.8% higher power demand at 170W vs 130W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌142.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon Pro 5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro 5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 58 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 53 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 38 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 516 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 413 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 258 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 310 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 206 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 129 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 327 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 83 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon Pro 5700

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon Pro 5700
Radeon Pro 5700
The Radeon Pro 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 4 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,469 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 11,469 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 48.2%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro 5700). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 6.221 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5700). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1350 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+48% | 11,469 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+56% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+105% | 6.221 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+32% | 1350 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 112 | 144+29% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro 5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro 5700 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro 5700) — the Radeon Pro 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5700). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon Pro 5700's 130W — a 26.7% difference. The Radeon Pro 5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 500W (Radeon Pro 5700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W | 130W-24% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+13% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro 5700 launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 58.8% less ($470 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 14.4 (Radeon Pro 5700) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 259% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2020).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-59% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+259% | 14.4 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | August 4 2020 |
| Ranking | #114 | #238 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












