
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅+8.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 300W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,633 vs 16,995).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌76.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 170W.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅+8.7% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 300W, a 130W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (15,633 vs 16,995).
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 51.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌76.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 170W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 148 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 124 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 703 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 563 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 264 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 176 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 149 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 67 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 15,633 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 8.7%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+9% | 15,633 |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 3584 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+19% | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz+18% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64 ×2+33% |
| TMUs | 112 | 224 ×2+100% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+298% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) — the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 32 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 300W — a 55.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-43% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+92% | 52.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | — |
| Codename | GA106 | Vega 10 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | August 26 2018 |
| Ranking | #114 | #592 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












