GeForce RTX 3060 vs Radeon Pro Vega II

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060

2021Core: 1320 MHzBoost: 1777 MHz
RTX family
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro Vega II

2019Core: 1574 MHzBoost: 1720 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce RTX 3060 vs Radeon Pro Vega II Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce RTX 3060 vs Radeon Pro Vega II FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce RTX 3060 vs Radeon Pro Vega II: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Why buy it

  • 23.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $1,870 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 628.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
  • Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
  • 100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Radeon Pro Vega II

2019

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
  • 2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 568.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,199 MSRPvs$329 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce RTX 3060 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 23.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 9% in PassMark G3D (16,995 vs 15,597), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs Unknown of VRAM, 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2019. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,870 cheaper on MSRP at $329 vs $2,199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 628.3% (51.7 vs 7.1), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce RTX 3060 vs Radeon Pro Vega II Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060

The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

AMD

Radeon Pro Vega II

The Radeon Pro Vega II is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1574 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,597 points. Launch price was $2,199.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon Pro Vega II's 15,597 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 9%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro Vega II uses GCN 5.1, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 14.09 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega II). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1720 MHz.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Radeon Pro Vega II
G3D Mark Score
16,995+9%
15,597
Architecture
Ampere
GCN 5.1
Process Node
8 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
3584
4096+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)
12.74 TFLOPS
14.09 TFLOPS+11%
Boost Clock
1777 MHz+3%
1720 MHz
ROPs
48
64+33%
TMUs
112
256+129%
L1 Cache
3.5 MB+250%
1 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
4 MB+33%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro Vega II leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Radeon Pro Vega II
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 2 Super Resolution
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega II carries 0 MB. GeForce RTX 3060 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon Pro Vega II) — a 140% advantage for the Radeon Pro Vega II. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 and 384-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega II. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega II) — the Radeon Pro Vega II has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Radeon Pro Vega II
VRAM Capacity
12 GB
Shared System RAM
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
360 GB/s
864 GB/s+140%
Bus Width
192-bit
384-bit+100%
L2 Cache
3 MB
4 MB+33%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Radeon Pro Vega II
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
6+50%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Radeon Pro Vega II
Encoder
NVENC 7th Gen
VCE 4.1
Decoder
NVDEC 5th Gen
UVD 7.2
Codecs
AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon Pro Vega II's 475W — a 94.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Integrated. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Radeon Pro Vega II
TDP
170W-64%
475W
Recommended PSU
550W
1W-100%
Power Connector
8-pin
Integrated
Length
242mm
267mm
Height
112mm
120mm
Slots
2-50%
4
Temp (Load)
75-12%
85°C
Perf/Watt
100.0+205%
32.8
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 came in at $329, while the Radeon Pro Vega II launched at $2199. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3060 was 85% cheaper ($1870 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 7.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 628.2% better value. The newer card here is GeForce RTX 3060 (2021 vs 2019).

FeatureGeForce RTX 3060Radeon Pro Vega II
MSRP
$329-85%
$2199
Performance per Dollar
51.7+628%
7.1
Codename
GA106
Vega 20
Release
January 12 2021
June 3 2019
Ranking
#114
#138

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.