
GeForce RTX 3060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅38.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 187% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌142.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅38.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 187% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3060 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌142.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 better than Radeon Pro W5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro W5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 149 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 131 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 118 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 92 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 67 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 58 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 32 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 354 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 310 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 195 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 222 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 196 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 128 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 110 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 94 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 77 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 765 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 612 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 510 FPS | 431 FPS |
| ultra | 382 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 535 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 432 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 366 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 243 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 367 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 162 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 523 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 452 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 383 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 319 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 371 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 298 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 245 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 279 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 186 FPS | 84 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon Pro W5700

GeForce RTX 3060
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 14,380 — the GeForce RTX 3060 leads by 18.2%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro W5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 1930 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995+18% | 14,380 |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+56% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS+43% | 8.893 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 1930 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 112 | 144+29% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5700 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) — the Radeon Pro W5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+50% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 205W — a 18.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-17% | 205W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+43% | 70.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 58.8% less ($470 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 18.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 187.2% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-59% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+187% | 18.0 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | November 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #114 | #163 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












