GeForce RTX 3060
Radeon Pro W6900X
GeForce RTX 3060 vs Radeon Pro W6900X Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3060 vs Radeon Pro W6900X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3060 vs Radeon Pro W6900X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $5,671 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1679.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 300W, a 130W reduction.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W6900X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro W6900X
2021Why buy it
- ✅31.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌1723.7% HIGHER MSRP$6,000 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌76.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 170W.
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 vs Radeon Pro W6900X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.
Radeon Pro W6900X
The Radeon Pro W6900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2150 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,413 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 and the Radeon Pro W6900X reaches 17,413 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro W6900X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 5,120 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 22.02 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W6900X). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2150 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 80 (Radeon Pro W6900X) with 112 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995 | 17,413+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 | 5120+43% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS | 22.02 TFLOPS+73% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2150 MHz+21% |
| ROPs | 48 | 128+167% |
| TMUs | 112 | 320+186% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+250% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 80+186% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro W6900X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W6900X carries 32 GB. Radeon Pro W6900X gives you 166.7% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W6900X. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W6900X) — the Radeon Pro W6900X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 32 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6900X).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon Pro W6900X's 300W — a 55.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W6900X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-43% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-15% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0+72% | 58.0 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 came in at $329, while the Radeon Pro W6900X launched at $6000. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3060 was 94.5% cheaper ($5671 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2.9 (Radeon Pro W6900X) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 1682.8% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-95% | $6000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+1683% | 2.9 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #114 | #101 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon Pro W6900X
