G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,671 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1679.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 170W instead of 300W, a 130W reduction.
✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W6900X across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro W6900X

2021

Why buy it

✅31.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌
1723.7% HIGHER MSRP
$6,000 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌76.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 170W.
❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.

GeForce RTX 3060

2021

Radeon Pro W6900X

2021

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,671 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 1679.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $6,000 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 170W instead of 300W, a 130W reduction.
✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅31.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W6900X across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌
1723.7% HIGHER MSRP
$6,000 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($6,000 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌76.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 170W.
❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro W6900X better than GeForce RTX 3060?

Yes. Radeon Pro W6900X is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 31.8% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data, 2.5% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 32 GB vs 12 GB of VRAM.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 3060 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro W6900X is about 1723.7% more expensive on MSRP at $6,000 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and you are getting 31.8% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 2.5% higher G3D Mark. GeForce RTX 3060 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon Pro W6900X is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce RTX 3060 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

When does GeForce RTX 3060 make more sense than Radeon Pro W6900X?

Yes. GeForce RTX 3060 is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is lower power draw (170W vs 300W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $329 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro W6900X. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro W6900X currently gives you 2.5% higher G3D Mark and 31.8% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce RTX 3060 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 3060 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro W6900X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon Pro W6900X
1080p
low	149 FPS	258 FPS
medium	131 FPS	235 FPS
high	118 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	126 FPS	242 FPS
medium	104 FPS	200 FPS
high	92 FPS	162 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	146 FPS
4K
low	67 FPS	171 FPS
medium	58 FPS	143 FPS
high	39 FPS	107 FPS
ultra	32 FPS	95 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon Pro W6900X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon Pro W6900X
1080p
low	354 FPS	564 FPS
medium	310 FPS	467 FPS
high	249 FPS	370 FPS
ultra	195 FPS	305 FPS
1440p
low	222 FPS	370 FPS
medium	196 FPS	303 FPS
high	160 FPS	250 FPS
ultra	128 FPS	195 FPS
4K
low	110 FPS	160 FPS
medium	94 FPS	135 FPS
high	77 FPS	113 FPS
ultra	60 FPS	88 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon Pro W6900X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon Pro W6900X
1080p
low	765 FPS	784 FPS
medium	612 FPS	627 FPS
high	510 FPS	522 FPS
ultra	382 FPS	392 FPS
1440p
low	535 FPS	588 FPS
medium	432 FPS	470 FPS
high	366 FPS	392 FPS
ultra	287 FPS	294 FPS
4K
low	367 FPS	392 FPS
medium	298 FPS	313 FPS
high	221 FPS	261 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	196 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon Pro W6900X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon Pro W6900X
1080p
low	523 FPS	684 FPS
medium	452 FPS	565 FPS
high	383 FPS	494 FPS
ultra	319 FPS	392 FPS
1440p
low	428 FPS	561 FPS
medium	371 FPS	468 FPS
high	298 FPS	392 FPS
ultra	245 FPS	294 FPS
4K
low	279 FPS	363 FPS
medium	259 FPS	313 FPS
high	225 FPS	261 FPS
ultra	186 FPS	196 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 3060 Open Radeon Pro W6900X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon Pro W6900X

GeForce RTX 3060

The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon Pro W6900X

The Radeon Pro W6900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2150 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,413 points. Launch price was $4,999.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 and the Radeon Pro W6900X reaches 17,413 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro W6900X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 5,120 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 22.02 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W6900X). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2150 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 80 (Radeon Pro W6900X) with 112 Tensor cores.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon Pro W6900X
G3D Mark Score	16,995	17,413+2%
Architecture	Ampere	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	3584	5120+43%
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.74 TFLOPS	22.02 TFLOPS+73%
Boost Clock	1777 MHz	2150 MHz+21%
ROPs	48	128+167%
TMUs	112	320+186%
L1 Cache	3.5 MB+250%	1 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB	4 MB+33%
Ray Tracing Cores	28	80+186%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 3060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W6900X relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon Pro W6900X
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 3060 comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W6900X has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro W6900X offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W6900X) — the Radeon Pro W6900X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon Pro W6900X
VRAM Capacity	12 GB	32 GB+167%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	192-bit+50%	128-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB	4 MB+33%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon Pro W6900X
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.4+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	6+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6900X).

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon Pro W6900X
Encoder	NVENC 7th Gen	VCN 3.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th Gen	VCN 3.0
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon Pro W6900X's 300W — a 55.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W6900X). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 3060	Radeon Pro W6900X
TDP	170W-43%	300W
Recommended PSU	550W-15%	650W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	242mm	267mm
Height	112mm	120mm
Slots	2-50%	4
Temp (Load)	75-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	100.0+72%	58.0

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce RTX 3060 launched at $329 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W6900X launched at $6000. The GeForce RTX 3060 costs 94.5% less ($5671 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2.9 (Radeon Pro W6900X) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 1682.8% better value.