
GeForce RTX 3060

Radeon PRO W7700
GeForce RTX 3060 vs Radeon PRO W7700 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce RTX 3060 vs Radeon PRO W7700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce RTX 3060 vs Radeon PRO W7700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce RTX 3060
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $670 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 123.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 51.7 vs 23.1 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Radeon PRO W7700 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
Radeon PRO W7700
2023Why buy it
- ✅25.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 12 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌203.6% HIGHER MSRP$999 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.1 vs 51.7 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce RTX 3060 vs Radeon PRO W7700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce RTX 3060
The GeForce RTX 3060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1777 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 170W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,995 points. Launch price was $329.

Radeon PRO W7700
The Radeon PRO W7700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2600 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 23,062 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce RTX 3060 scores 16,995 versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 23,062 — the Radeon PRO W7700 leads by 35.7%. The GeForce RTX 3060 is built on Ampere while the Radeon PRO W7700 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 3,072 (Radeon PRO W7700). Raw compute: 12.74 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 31.95 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7700). Boost clocks: 1777 MHz vs 2600 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 48 (Radeon PRO W7700) with 112 Tensor cores.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,995 | 23,062+36% |
| Architecture | Ampere | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+17% | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.74 TFLOPS | 31.95 TFLOPS+151% |
| Boost Clock | 1777 MHz | 2600 MHz+46% |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 112 | 192+71% |
| L1 Cache | 3.5 MB+367% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 48+71% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W7700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 3060 has 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W7700 carries 16 GB. Radeon PRO W7700 gives you 33.3% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 360 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 432 GB/s (Radeon PRO W7700) — a 20% advantage for the Radeon PRO W7700. Memory bus width is 192-bit on the GeForce RTX 3060 and 192-bit on the Radeon PRO W7700. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W7700) — the GeForce RTX 3060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 16 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 432 GB/s+20% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 3060) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7700). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 3060 draws 170W versus the Radeon PRO W7700's 190W — a 11.1% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 550W (Radeon PRO W7700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 242mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 170W-11% | 190W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 550W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 242mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.0 | 121.4+21% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce RTX 3060 came in at $329, while the Radeon PRO W7700 launched at $999. On MSRP, GeForce RTX 3060 was 67.1% cheaper ($670 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 51.7 (GeForce RTX 3060) vs 23.1 (Radeon PRO W7700) — the GeForce RTX 3060 offers 123.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W7700 (2023 vs 2021).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 3060 | Radeon PRO W7700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-67% | $999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 51.7+124% | 23.1 |
| Codename | GA106 | Navi 32 |
| Release | January 12 2021 | November 13 2023 |
| Ranking | #114 | #52 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














